earthmansurfer
Active member
This, I believe, is an excellent (less than 2 minute) example of the effect of co-located iron on a non-ferrous target.
There was noticeable rust in the ground as I reached the target as well as attached to the target (and you can see it falling off). The rusted iron in the vicinity rose the VID on the Fe side a full 50%, from 13 to 20 or so!
For any detector, this drop will probably happen and most people don't dig these signals. I like the phrase from TheMarshal - "They are metal rejectionists, not detectorists." ;-)
One can only imagine how much the VID can drop depending on the size, state, vicinity, etc. of the iron to the target.
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU6mGxS8HQQ[/video]
There was noticeable rust in the ground as I reached the target as well as attached to the target (and you can see it falling off). The rusted iron in the vicinity rose the VID on the Fe side a full 50%, from 13 to 20 or so!
For any detector, this drop will probably happen and most people don't dig these signals. I like the phrase from TheMarshal - "They are metal rejectionists, not detectorists." ;-)
One can only imagine how much the VID can drop depending on the size, state, vicinity, etc. of the iron to the target.
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU6mGxS8HQQ[/video]
great video but don't tell everyone
numbers are numbers and the etrac can give many reasons not to dig if the screen is consulted to much sound is how detecting started and nothing has changed IMHO.