beepsilver
Member
Yesterday I hunted a couple of larger permission sites. I quickly found out the 4K program with full tones I was using for depth and collocated targets was taking too long for the time I had allotted--there was a lot of trash. I was coinshooting, so I needed the coins to "pop" rather than investigate each individual questionable signal. I switched over to Andy's Super Trashy program here: http://www.findmall.com/read.php?83,1927407 which really enabled me to speed up and hear the good targets over the questionable ones. I realize I probably left some keepers behind doing this; I can always go back.
Here's the program (copied from his link above here on Findmall):
FREQ: 12 kHz
DISC: 10
IRON VOL: 0 (not interested in the presence of iron)
REACTIVITY: 3 and then increased to 4 in the bad sections
SENSITIVITY: 80 (no point in overloading on the shallow trash and based on pulling a 1944 Mercury dime at 7", it was still getting the depth)
SILENCER: 2
AUDIO R: 3 (decreased from the usual 5) - did not need the amplification based on the depth targets were being recovered from
BREAK POINTS: 10, 48, 56, 72
TONES: Set to make the coin regions (49 to 56 and 73+) produce a DIG signal. I set the tones for the 10-48 and 57 to 72 at a lower value which made the coins a snap to pick out
As you can see Andy's program uses 12K, breakpoints and tones to produce a "dig" signal. I liked using the program and the tones are sweet for digging coins. I kept an adjacent, but different 4K program for bottlecap ID as well as checking for deeper, not quite so clear (potential silver) signals when his program found range limits (at this place with targets seemingly limited to 5-6 inches, my 4K program found nothing Andy's program couldn't see). Anyway, I liked using the program, but have a question for the audience. I would like to use 4K keeping all the other settings the same except tone breakpoints--how would you set tone breakpoints to avoid pushing desirable targets into the undesirable tone range?
One thing I've noticed that you have to watch out for [when using his program] is that the wiggleback method for pinpointing a DESIRABLE target will sometimes produce a growly low tone sound when you reach the edge of the target--I suppose as the coil slides and finds the edge of the target, the conductivity changes enough to push it into the undesirable tone range. Of course this is what we listen for when we want to make a dig, no-dig decision on iron. This happened to me twice (in multiple sweep directions) while using his program. Once on a medium sized gold-filled ring a couple of weeks ago and then again yesterday on the two mercs that were in the same hole. Based on what I've read, the growl made me not want to dig, but my frequency comparison-check said dig on both occasions--glad I did! Now, keep in mind, with his tone settings, the growl on a good target's edge is much cleaner than on true trash and is very easy to distinguish.
One other thing I learned using Andy's program that I want to share is...and my understanding of the technical details may be off, so correct me if I'm wrong, but with Reactivity at 3 and Silencer at 2, the coil does not "hook" (thanks for the term CZ!) the target as thoroughly as Reactivity 2/Silencer 0...this only occurs when the target has a little depth. Consequently, when you are pinpointing a target at say for example 3 or more inches using the wiggleback method (this is what I use and doubt the "X" pinpointing method is similarly affected), the top of your coil might not indicate the true edge of the target, it will stop seeing the target before the top of the coil gets to the edge of the target. This will put you in a situation that sets you up to scratch your target when you dig. If I understand my own concept correctly, then I have to assume that with greater depth, this problem will become more prevalent. Knowing this, having some idea of the target's depth will allow you to make the necessary adjustment either by dragging beyond where the sound stops, or by using a different pinpointing method.
Here are the finds from two sites. The Indians came from one site and the silver from another. Both mercs came from the same hole which was a nice surprise, and the signal in 12K and 4K both showed and sounded like a quarter. They were side-by-side. Beggars can't be choosey, but since I didn't come up with the 1877 Indian, at least the 1876 is primo conditio--you can see his eyebrow for Pete's sake!
Here's the program (copied from his link above here on Findmall):
FREQ: 12 kHz
DISC: 10
IRON VOL: 0 (not interested in the presence of iron)
REACTIVITY: 3 and then increased to 4 in the bad sections
SENSITIVITY: 80 (no point in overloading on the shallow trash and based on pulling a 1944 Mercury dime at 7", it was still getting the depth)
SILENCER: 2
AUDIO R: 3 (decreased from the usual 5) - did not need the amplification based on the depth targets were being recovered from
BREAK POINTS: 10, 48, 56, 72
TONES: Set to make the coin regions (49 to 56 and 73+) produce a DIG signal. I set the tones for the 10-48 and 57 to 72 at a lower value which made the coins a snap to pick out
As you can see Andy's program uses 12K, breakpoints and tones to produce a "dig" signal. I liked using the program and the tones are sweet for digging coins. I kept an adjacent, but different 4K program for bottlecap ID as well as checking for deeper, not quite so clear (potential silver) signals when his program found range limits (at this place with targets seemingly limited to 5-6 inches, my 4K program found nothing Andy's program couldn't see). Anyway, I liked using the program, but have a question for the audience. I would like to use 4K keeping all the other settings the same except tone breakpoints--how would you set tone breakpoints to avoid pushing desirable targets into the undesirable tone range?
One thing I've noticed that you have to watch out for [when using his program] is that the wiggleback method for pinpointing a DESIRABLE target will sometimes produce a growly low tone sound when you reach the edge of the target--I suppose as the coil slides and finds the edge of the target, the conductivity changes enough to push it into the undesirable tone range. Of course this is what we listen for when we want to make a dig, no-dig decision on iron. This happened to me twice (in multiple sweep directions) while using his program. Once on a medium sized gold-filled ring a couple of weeks ago and then again yesterday on the two mercs that were in the same hole. Based on what I've read, the growl made me not want to dig, but my frequency comparison-check said dig on both occasions--glad I did! Now, keep in mind, with his tone settings, the growl on a good target's edge is much cleaner than on true trash and is very easy to distinguish.
One other thing I learned using Andy's program that I want to share is...and my understanding of the technical details may be off, so correct me if I'm wrong, but with Reactivity at 3 and Silencer at 2, the coil does not "hook" (thanks for the term CZ!) the target as thoroughly as Reactivity 2/Silencer 0...this only occurs when the target has a little depth. Consequently, when you are pinpointing a target at say for example 3 or more inches using the wiggleback method (this is what I use and doubt the "X" pinpointing method is similarly affected), the top of your coil might not indicate the true edge of the target, it will stop seeing the target before the top of the coil gets to the edge of the target. This will put you in a situation that sets you up to scratch your target when you dig. If I understand my own concept correctly, then I have to assume that with greater depth, this problem will become more prevalent. Knowing this, having some idea of the target's depth will allow you to make the necessary adjustment either by dragging beyond where the sound stops, or by using a different pinpointing method.
Here are the finds from two sites. The Indians came from one site and the silver from another. Both mercs came from the same hole which was a nice surprise, and the signal in 12K and 4K both showed and sounded like a quarter. They were side-by-side. Beggars can't be choosey, but since I didn't come up with the 1877 Indian, at least the 1876 is primo conditio--you can see his eyebrow for Pete's sake!