You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
How do you measure?
Nauti, I agree with you. The T2+ has done me right for years now. I fell victim to the Equinox hype. I'm sticking with the T2.^put it in all metal......you will find every good target there is to find.
The T2 is a really good machine and in reality it will find just as much as anything else in the right hands.......don't expect your finds rates to get much better than you have with the T2 and you won't be massively disappointed you spent all that money on an equinox.
I had one of the original T2's over here in the uk........had a lot of success with mine including use on sites that had a lot of iron in them.I only parted with mine as i moved to the coast and now hunt the beaches most of the time.And yes,there is so much hype surrounding detectors these days.....ive owned a lot of machines over the years and learned that all the good machines out there will find the same amount of stuff in reality....,,,the T2 really hasn't got a lot to worry about just yet.
Been using the Equinox 600 for a while now, it's a good machine but it's no better than the T2+ in my opinion. The equinox has some good features over the T2+, especially the multi frequency and notch discrimination but these are modes coin hunters use. I relic hunt so these features are something I would never use. I'm not seeing where the Equinox is any better in trashy iron spot than the T2+ but I will say this I think I have 2 good metal detectors ( T2+ Equinox 600) now. I'm saying I think these machines are about equal.
