You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Intruder said:The Shadow X-5 is similar in depth to the Tejon . The X-5 was and still is a depth demon . It has the ability to be used as a manual ground balanced machine , a fixed ground balance , and a manual ground balanced beach mode . It also has the ability to be used in the rain without ruining the electronics . It only weighs approximately 2.5 lbs. The Cortez lacks the depth of both the Tejon and the X-5.
Yes, quite a bit.pjroo3 said:Does anyone here have any experience with the X-5?
I had experiences with the Cortés as well, but if you think it's a great machine, there w definitely differ on that opinion. My experiences with it when first released as well as with the 2nd specimen I had were not very impressive. I felt it was over-priced at the time of introduction, and definitely is today, as the competitor's have a lot to offer that outclass the Cortés. Plus it is limited in versatility and using accessory search coils in a wide range of mineralized environments due to the internally preset Disc. mode GB. That's where I experienced the most irritations with the Cortés.pjroo3 said:I currently have a Cortes and it is a great machine.
If I was forced to choose between those two to select one detector to use exclusively for three months, it would be the Cortés.pjroo3 said:I just enjoy trying other machines and was wondering if the X-5 is as good as the Cortes?