You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Few new machines push out Inna hurry because customers keep nagging them.
I'll be the real test to this and on a Mac.
Let me know.
They did, not their fault that the demo for metal detectorists skews old/technophobe.
Interesting thought. I thought i remember somewhere, probably with Tesoro that you can get slightly different results with two different detectors of the same kind. In other words each one can behave slightly differently, not every vaquero made for example, even though made the same way will be exactly the same the way it behaves so to speak. I forgot the theory behind that.
It was the tuner. Their was one engineer who made them perfect. Darn if I can remember his name.
That's sample variability, and it always exists if you produce 2 or more of anything. It can be reduced, but it's always there (optics, electronics, cars, you name it). Some technologies have extremely small variability tolerance (for example, most microprocessors), but in general manufacturers tend to play it as loose as they can get away with, since it benefits the sacred Bottom Line.
