You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Outstanding and some fine gold gold!!
By zero disc do you.mean the all metal mode?
He says whatever he wants to say and some of that helps grow his YouTube channel. Unfortunately a lot of what he says about the Vortex software issues is true. There have been a lot of updates both to add good features but also to fix many bugs and software programming mistakes. Basically, if you have only used previous Garrett VLF detectors, the Vortex series is a big improvement both in features, performance and ergonomics. Unlike your statement above, the Vortex works really well. I have owned or used all three AT series Garretts, the Ace Apex and the original Ace series detectors. Vortex beats them easily. However, if you have used other manufacturer recently released simultaneous multi frequency detectors that have lower, similar or higher prices, the Vortex just doesn't quite stack up well against them. I like the Vortex models and I am glad that Garrett has finally made a competitive, modern featured, simultaneous multi frequency/selectable single frequency detector but the Vortex as it is right now has a ways to go yet to out perform its direct competition. My feedback is from direct personal experience and not from any other source.
Loren Lemke is saying (basically) the same words about the Vortex as CD is (and now Jeff).
