Minelabs seem too overpriced , most Whites seem too complicated , so that leaves me thinking a Garretts would be my best alternative machine.
'Bout sums it up. Not that I have anything against Australia, mind you, but the Minelabs are made there, in OZ - not in the US of A. Just in case you didn't know it. To me, in this day and time, that matters for something. Call me a rebel.
Whites? I like 'em, in general, and have a very nice Eagle II SL '91 now. Looking back, I've nearly always had one or another of the Sweet Home products. Complicated? The higher end ones, oh yeah.
At the lower end, not so much, but not so unique either. Once they went to the underslung housing as standard, though, they got ergonomically cranky, IMHO.
Paradoxically, only Tesoros vie with Garrett

for ease of use. I say paradoxically, because the former are analog modeled units. Dead simple and dead basic, with the exception of their flagship model.
The Garretts

are none of those things... Not analog modeled, not dead simple and not dead basic.
Yet, Garrett

has managed to integrate the right user features and high-performance digital parameters to the benefit of the operator.
Some say they are gimmicky, even toyishly so. Having used many "hardcore" and elitist detectors over the years (including Tesoro), I understand
why they say that.
TRUE CONFESSION TIME:
I used to say it myself.
But if you sell Garretts

short, based on that reasoning, well - that's okay with me. I won't hold it against you while I'm out enjoying mine.
Get you a Garrett

. Let it grow on you. If you dont like it, then, there are plenty of people here and elsewhere who will make you a good and fair offer on it.
You can hardly lose for having tried one.