TheMarshall
New member
Hi There. Cal.
I'm just trying to untangle the debate regarding Racer's TID problems, from the original V3- F75 post.
I may be wrong in assuming the quote below belongs to your good self. My apologies if I'm mistaken.
Bold statements for someone who probably hasn't a clue as to the complex mineralized nature of Northern California soil and how it affects TID processing, add to that the depths that we typically need to obtain to detect older coins and text book perfect detecting scenarios can be thrown out.
Cal....... I note your comments, and thanks for your opinions.
I would appreciate it if you can give me the data that you consider is representative of typical North Californian soils, for you are correct in the assumption that I don't know the specific mineral composition of your particular QTH in North Californian, so if you will, please share your knowledge on the subject.
As a scientific person, I admittedly have a more pragmatic approach to the physics of the hobby than the average detectorist, but I make no apologies to for that.
Your post correctly reminded forum readers of the important effect soil mineralisation has on modifying the TID of a target whilst in the ground. That was the essence of my provocative post
I'm just trying to untangle the debate regarding Racer's TID problems, from the original V3- F75 post.
I may be wrong in assuming the quote below belongs to your good self. My apologies if I'm mistaken.
Bold statements for someone who probably hasn't a clue as to the complex mineralized nature of Northern California soil and how it affects TID processing, add to that the depths that we typically need to obtain to detect older coins and text book perfect detecting scenarios can be thrown out.
Cal....... I note your comments, and thanks for your opinions.
I would appreciate it if you can give me the data that you consider is representative of typical North Californian soils, for you are correct in the assumption that I don't know the specific mineral composition of your particular QTH in North Californian, so if you will, please share your knowledge on the subject.
As a scientific person, I admittedly have a more pragmatic approach to the physics of the hobby than the average detectorist, but I make no apologies to for that.
Your post correctly reminded forum readers of the important effect soil mineralisation has on modifying the TID of a target whilst in the ground. That was the essence of my provocative post