sqwaby said:
Also I've noticed the the V will not totally disc out iron even when its disc is set in silver range when the target is large(like a 3 or 4" pipe collar or similair) sometimes it will start to break up as you reach max disc. is this normal?
Lets take the last, first. Is it normal? Yes. Large iron overloads the sensitive circuits of todays detectors - I can't explain it better than that. Most detectors, no matter who makes them, have this same issue to some degree.
Contrary to popular opinion, the biggest bugaboo we face in detecting is not the pull-tab - it's iron in the soil. In all it's many forms, it causes no end of trouble for 'tectors .
I get down about 8-10" max on coins with a V, and would like to try a G umax. Do you think it will go as deep as the V?
Well, yes and no.
I've done it with mine. Last season, I found a quarter at a measured 10.5". Allowing for operator error and optimism, we'll call it 8-8.5"
In fact I've always been a little SUPRISED at how well the Golden responds to good targets at depth. After all, it's supposed to not have any depth... at least that's what many people say. When you consider that it is simply a hot uMax with tones and notch added, it stands to reason that it has some good depth capacity.
What it does not have is an adjustable ground balance and whatever extra "oomph" the Vaquero has. Under the wrong ground conditions or at extreme depths, the Golden could suffer.
But we're really comparing apples to oranges here. These two detectors each offer a different suite of features; comparing them on the same playing field will always leave something coming up short. Instead, take them each for what they are.
If you really want the extra inch or two of raw depth that the V offers, then keep it. For everything else, get a Golden. Between them, you'll cover about all the bases.
PS - What I'd really like to see is the tone and notch features of the GuMax added to the V. Now that would answer a lot of prayers!