You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Dave, that's a good thing because believe it or not most of my better finds have been in the ground not in the air, lol. Whatever you & Jorge did when you "built" the Eurotek you did it well. I thank you's for producing such a good working affordable detector.Dave J. said:Jorge developed the Eurotek. He's gotten pretty darn good at beeper engineering, my role was basically that of occasional advisor.
Yesterday we got dragged into a marketing dept. "problem". A prominent customer had registered a concern that a competitor's machine in the same price range had bested the Eurotek slightly in a particular test which although not literally an "air test", was nearly the equivalent. This same customer admitted that the Eurotek knocked the socks off the competitor's machine when it comes to buried targets esp. in trashy areas. Marketing dept. wanted to know how in one particular air test, the competitor's machine had bested (slightly) the Eurotek.
I'd forgotten what was in the Eurotek software, my first explanation of the little embarassment was wrong. Yi, a relatively new engineer who is familiar with the platform, plowed through the code and explained to me what was actually in there. Rebooting my memory of what we'd done, gave me the opportunity to think through again why we'd done it that way, which I was now able to explain to Yi.
In air testing we were not able to duplicate the little embarrassment that the customer had encountered, but our test conditions were not identical and we can't replicate the customer's test conditions.
The bottom line was that the software and hardware of this platform were not designed to deliver the world's most impressive air test, it was all designed to work well under trashy conditions. And the engineering effort succeeded: its performance "in the ground" is often compared to machines costing 2-3 times as much.
--Dave J.