Keith Southern
Active member
for about 8 hours and that may not sound like much but if you're not from the south you have to experience the humidity here to fully understand the meaning of sweating..Ha-Ha.
Wish I had something earth shattering to tell you but only got 2 keepers a token and a stirrup.and neither target was deep or masked they were in a spot I had never swung.
I stayed in the iron almost all day to no avail.Maybe I'm asking to much these sites I was in I have pretty much just hammered them into oblivion.lots of nails but Ive had the 1236 in these places and pretty much its just dead .I dug a ton of iffy hits but nothing all day was pulled in the dense iron nail's.
These places are not the type of areas a magazine field tester would go but I'm wanting something to out do what I already have so thats the way my testing will go.Ground reading was 71-76 in these sites with 1 fe bar.
I can tell you what the DD is doing for the omega though.
1-Target separation is just as good as the f-75/t-2 (close your eyes in 2 tone and you think you're swinging a t-2)
2-I'D' Seems tighter less jumpy better lock.
3-Deeper than the stock coil by a good measure air-testing
4- Sees more targets in the ground than the stock coil (I.E. more iron grunts compared to the stock coil also more iffy hits!!)
5- Still retains the ability to remain quite while sweeping the coil at max gain! ( I was worried the DD would eliminate this but It didnt)
6- Un-masking ability is on par with the big boys now.No difference
7- Slightly heavier than stock coil but still way lite.
These are some of the thing's I'm seeing .
Now for the life of me I dont understand why Teknetics would'nt put this coil on the Omega or any of the new models for that matter.They have the industry leading coil design by far . you know they spent some change designing that coil so why stick an inferior coil on the lower end machines.If I was them I would want the whole line of detectors to outdo the competition of a comparable model.
I'm sure theres more to it than I know but I just care about performance .And the Bi-axial coil is the best coil ever made at retaining depth and target separation together.Theres no equal.
sorry I dont have more right now but I'll try it the next few days and week to come.
Anyone else got any input on the Omega with DD ?? I have been reading between the lines on another forum and I belive they are wanting to implement the stability of the omega into the top of the line First texas detectors in the future .One guy is truly enamored with the stability in iron with the DD calling it the best yet.
Keith southern
Wish I had something earth shattering to tell you but only got 2 keepers a token and a stirrup.and neither target was deep or masked they were in a spot I had never swung.
I stayed in the iron almost all day to no avail.Maybe I'm asking to much these sites I was in I have pretty much just hammered them into oblivion.lots of nails but Ive had the 1236 in these places and pretty much its just dead .I dug a ton of iffy hits but nothing all day was pulled in the dense iron nail's.
These places are not the type of areas a magazine field tester would go but I'm wanting something to out do what I already have so thats the way my testing will go.Ground reading was 71-76 in these sites with 1 fe bar.
I can tell you what the DD is doing for the omega though.
1-Target separation is just as good as the f-75/t-2 (close your eyes in 2 tone and you think you're swinging a t-2)
2-I'D' Seems tighter less jumpy better lock.
3-Deeper than the stock coil by a good measure air-testing
4- Sees more targets in the ground than the stock coil (I.E. more iron grunts compared to the stock coil also more iffy hits!!)
5- Still retains the ability to remain quite while sweeping the coil at max gain! ( I was worried the DD would eliminate this but It didnt)
6- Un-masking ability is on par with the big boys now.No difference
7- Slightly heavier than stock coil but still way lite.
These are some of the thing's I'm seeing .
Now for the life of me I dont understand why Teknetics would'nt put this coil on the Omega or any of the new models for that matter.They have the industry leading coil design by far . you know they spent some change designing that coil so why stick an inferior coil on the lower end machines.If I was them I would want the whole line of detectors to outdo the competition of a comparable model.
I'm sure theres more to it than I know but I just care about performance .And the Bi-axial coil is the best coil ever made at retaining depth and target separation together.Theres no equal.
sorry I dont have more right now but I'll try it the next few days and week to come.
Anyone else got any input on the Omega with DD ?? I have been reading between the lines on another forum and I belive they are wanting to implement the stability of the omega into the top of the line First texas detectors in the future .One guy is truly enamored with the stability in iron with the DD calling it the best yet.
Keith southern