Had some time today and decided to play a little with my MX Sport to see how coin orientation affects TID. Used High trash with no discrimination, sense at 6, Mild sandy soil , ground balance at 62. Using the 6" Detech coil. Planted a clad nickle flat ( horizontal ) at 5". Sweep TID left, right, left, right, etc. was 26 24 30 24 26 20 30 22 24 30. Now, I often cherry pick coins. When I dig nickles, they are almost always in the 16-20 TID. Square tabs are usually in the 20 to 30 range. I would not have dug this nickle if I was cherry picking. I would not have thought anything of moving on because not only was the TID too high but the number was too variable. My assumption would have been that the target was not symmetrical and therefore giving a wide ranging TID. Probably can slaw or a square tab. So, being a little confused about the higher than expected TID, I placed the nickle in the same orientation at 2". Same settings, same coil, same ground balance. Left, right, left, etc sweep: 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20. Would have dug it all day every day. Lessons learned: First, be aware that variable TDI and depth can be related, even at 5". Two, which I was already aware of but thought it started deeper than 5"- MXS up-averages TID at depth. Three, nickles are a b*t*h to cherry pick unless they are shallow.
So, time to move on to the nickle on edge at 5". Same settings, same coil, same ground balance.Sweep perpendicular to the face of the coin, left, right, left, etc: 18 35 18 4 16 8 16 8 16 12/4 14/14 35 18 22. The #/# were double beeps that I caught both TIDs in a single sweep. There were several other double-beeps but I didn't catch both TIDs. So, usually I note double beeps on shallow targets. I would not consider a nickle at 5" a shallow target. Lesson: A coin on edge at depth can give a double beep. Next, sweep the coin at 5" parallel to the face. Same settings, same coil, same ground balance. Sweep left, right, left, etc. : 96 - - - - - - - Where - equals no beep/no TID. Upping the sensitivity did make that coin appear but I did not pursue that for this investigation. However, moving the coil back away from the axis of the coin made it reappear. Sweeping parallel to the face of the coin but about 4" away from the coin perpendicular to the face, left, right, left, etc.: 71 18 0 60 45 50 73 60. Interesting. Also, got a series of TIDs about 4" perpendicular to the opposite face of the coin. I did not record those TIDs but they were similar to the previous TIDs in range and variability. Okay, what about pinpointing? The coin pinpointed about 4" away from actual location , perpendicular to the face of the coin, on both sides of the coin, at 7.5 inches. So, if you locate a target that fits this situation, you want to locate the two pinpoints, draw a line connecting them, find the center point of that line and this is approximately where your target will be. Expect it to be shallower than the displayed depth. Had I pinpointd this taget at only one point I very well may have missed it because I try to keep my holes small (park hunting). Truth is, I probably never would have dug it in the first place, writing it off as junk.
Looking at all this it is easy to see how many coins are being missed by anyone who does not "dig it all". This doesn't even take into account comingled targets, TIDs affected by heavy iron soils, etc. Add into this the pendulum swings of many detectorists, the lack of overlapping sweeps, poor pinpointing of tagets (I have found some nice old coins in or next to holes others have dug). Will I start digging it all now. No. Bad back and bad knees, hunting in public parks, and HOT Florida weather combined with limited time to hunt most days equals selective digging. However, I will dig more iffy signals when they show depth and the possibility of being something good.
Hope someone finds this helpful. Happy hunting!
So, time to move on to the nickle on edge at 5". Same settings, same coil, same ground balance.Sweep perpendicular to the face of the coin, left, right, left, etc: 18 35 18 4 16 8 16 8 16 12/4 14/14 35 18 22. The #/# were double beeps that I caught both TIDs in a single sweep. There were several other double-beeps but I didn't catch both TIDs. So, usually I note double beeps on shallow targets. I would not consider a nickle at 5" a shallow target. Lesson: A coin on edge at depth can give a double beep. Next, sweep the coin at 5" parallel to the face. Same settings, same coil, same ground balance. Sweep left, right, left, etc. : 96 - - - - - - - Where - equals no beep/no TID. Upping the sensitivity did make that coin appear but I did not pursue that for this investigation. However, moving the coil back away from the axis of the coin made it reappear. Sweeping parallel to the face of the coin but about 4" away from the coin perpendicular to the face, left, right, left, etc.: 71 18 0 60 45 50 73 60. Interesting. Also, got a series of TIDs about 4" perpendicular to the opposite face of the coin. I did not record those TIDs but they were similar to the previous TIDs in range and variability. Okay, what about pinpointing? The coin pinpointed about 4" away from actual location , perpendicular to the face of the coin, on both sides of the coin, at 7.5 inches. So, if you locate a target that fits this situation, you want to locate the two pinpoints, draw a line connecting them, find the center point of that line and this is approximately where your target will be. Expect it to be shallower than the displayed depth. Had I pinpointd this taget at only one point I very well may have missed it because I try to keep my holes small (park hunting). Truth is, I probably never would have dug it in the first place, writing it off as junk.
Looking at all this it is easy to see how many coins are being missed by anyone who does not "dig it all". This doesn't even take into account comingled targets, TIDs affected by heavy iron soils, etc. Add into this the pendulum swings of many detectorists, the lack of overlapping sweeps, poor pinpointing of tagets (I have found some nice old coins in or next to holes others have dug). Will I start digging it all now. No. Bad back and bad knees, hunting in public parks, and HOT Florida weather combined with limited time to hunt most days equals selective digging. However, I will dig more iffy signals when they show depth and the possibility of being something good.
Hope someone finds this helpful. Happy hunting!