Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Air tests - Beach Hunter ID

JohnNZ

New member
Hello all
Initial air tests on Beach hunter ID results:
Compared to whites MXT and garrett GTAx 1250

for all test items
MXT most sensitive
followed by gtax1250
followed by BH ID

Im not all that impressed with the BH ID initial air test results.
any comments?
anyhting im doing wrong?
got sens at preset, gnd = halfway. thrsh = 1.2 way.mode = disc

thanks
John
 
Hi John,

What you are doing wrong is air testing instead of testing on a slatwater beach. The dual frequency of the BHID was designed for saltwater use, where it will generally outperform single frequency detectors.

So drag the three units to a saltwater beach, and use one to go find a real target. Then check it with the other two machines. I prefer this method over using freshly buried items as again that is not a real world test. After a couple hours of detecting/comparing you should have a genuine idea of how the units compare.

This is an exceedingly good example of why air tests simply do not work. A saltwater beach hunting situation is really tough, and often machines that air test the best do the worst in a saltwater environment!

All that said, John, if you are not hunting in saltwater then the BHID will be out of it's environment and so other units may outperform it.

Steve Herschbach
 
You are rignt - the BH ID is performing well on the beach and I have dug some deep items. But it seems to be ok at parks etc as well!
After using the MXT its quite nice as I have to rely more on "visual ID" - ie dig and see approach - less chance of missing items I may have chosen to not dig with the MXT!
I enjoy your posts - thansk for the time taken to post them!
I hope to do some gold fossicking on some creeks here in New Zealand soon!
regards
JOhn:detecting:
 
Top