Was just wondering how many of you guys with higher-end machines have actually hunted with someone using a modern day entry-level detector and noticed how good they have become anymore? Late last fall I finally hunted with a friend who has such a machine (The White's Coinmaster) and even though that day I was hunting with a machine costing about 4 times more not including the coil, I was truly impressed with the performance of the $180 entry-level Coinmaster. I have no doubt that other entry level detectors are just as good, if not better. Anyhow I was so impressed with the Coinmaster that when my buddy decided to upgrade???, I jumped at the chance to buy his mint condition (still has original batteries) Coinmaster.
Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
Comparing entry level detectors to higher end machines:
- Thread starter Mtnmn
- Start date
Jason in Enid
Active member
It used to be that entry level machines were pretty much toys. When Garrett released thier Ace150 it was a whole new world. For the first time ever you could buy a good quality machine at an entry level price. Garrett was so successful that White's and Tesoro were forced to follow suit or lose the entire "beginner" market.
No, you can't get top-end performance with an entry level detector. But when figuring in 5 times the cost of an entry level detector, you are going to be lucky if you will gain much over 1 1/2 times in performance using a higher-end detector. That in itself is a real bargain for those who don't want or are unable to afford a top-end machine. At least it levels the playing field a little.
imi_wakaranai
New member
The best MDist I ever knew hunted with a Whites IDX Pro. He paid about $400 for it I, at the time, had a ML Ex II which I paid $1200 for. It was my 1st MD, granted, but this guy dug circles around me.
The time to get in on this sport was back in the 70's for the silver, Now, sweeping fresh drops and targets 5" on up can be a profitable and very fun excursion. There will always be a market for the high end product, But I bet the future will reside in the 400.00 price point neighborhood.
Mud
Mud
MarkCZ
Well-known member
I actually own a Fisher F2,
Two coil package,
$215.00 SHIPPED!
Its a surprising little detector and it is considered a entry level detector.
I never bought it for my main detector, I got it for a back up and or one for the grand kids to use (not happened yet)
If I was going Tot-lot hunting, I would use this detector over the others I have.
Mark
Two coil package,
$215.00 SHIPPED!
Its a surprising little detector and it is considered a entry level detector.
I never bought it for my main detector, I got it for a back up and or one for the grand kids to use (not happened yet)
If I was going Tot-lot hunting, I would use this detector over the others I have.
Mark
Part of the reason is that cheaper machines give you less information, less excuses not to dig. So you dig more targets. When you dig more targets, you dig more trash, but all also dig more of the good stuff.
High end detectors give you a lot of information that may or may not be accurate. They coax you into cherry picking more. Thats not always the best idea.
High end detectors give you a lot of information that may or may not be accurate. They coax you into cherry picking more. Thats not always the best idea.
Jason in Enid
Active member
Smudge said:
They also give you more depth. Some may argue that for that extra $1000 you only get 1 extra inch (just random depth number), but if a park has been worked clean with older technology and you can come in and see one more inch down, then you have a huge amount of targets nobody else has touched.
It doesn't mean lower priced detectors are "junk" or "toys", it just means they can't do as much.
TerraDigger
New member
Jason is correct. There are certain areas that a entry level machine will simply not have the capability to find anything more than shallow. Here in Idaho, one needs at least a medium grade detector to get more than 4" deep. Actually, E-Trac's are the preferred units here. Although I do pretty good with my Omega and its DD coils.
BarberBill
New member
Big Red said:
Tesoro had the entry level Compadre with a 7" coil on the market long before Garrett even had the Ace 150 on the drawing board.
BB
Shenandoah Digger
New member
You got that right Bill. For as long as I can remember Tesoro has made an entry level detector with very good performance.
The difference is often minimal in shallow modern areas with the exception of faster response detectors that will work better in the trash. So if that is all a person is interested in then there is little need for a high end detector. If, however, you enviously watch videos of the guys pulling out a lot of old silver coins and relics, then take note of the metal detectors they are using. There is a reason they are using mid to high end detectors. Better depth, better id at depth, recovery time, stability in mineralization all come to mind. Metal detecting depth is measured in inches not usually feet so every extra inch is important. IMHO
imi_wakaranai
New member
Nicely summarized
kai_gold said: