Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

depth test

Yeah, it is interesting. By their own admission, however...

"All tests are performed by very experienced treasure hunters...Each detectorist participating in the test makes use of his own device, emulating realistic treasure hunting conditions."

...and...

"The grounds are mineralized, iron-polluted and located close to a Roman road." -- very specific conditions...unique even

There are so many variables: The user, the machine (manufacturing variability, condition), machine settings, variable conditions at the site, etc. The user is probably the biggest variable...we've all seen folks that are truly gifted at this hobby and then there's the rest of us.

It might be valuable in general terms for choosing a manufacturer, perhaps. Minelab, Nexus and XP look strong. I think the best advice when choosing a detector is to test drive various models in your area...it's not all about depth.

Beep
 
I did note the seeming lack of sensitivity with the 6x8 SEF and Explorer. I thought that coil might be ideal in the average park. Not sure now. Anyone have experience with it vs. the pro 11" on an e-trac???
 
Wow, the only thing the GTI 1500 could find was a musket ball at 5.91 inches? It didn't find ONE coin? How does Garrett stay in business? :rolleyes:
 
I bookmarked that a long time ago and it's an interesting reference. I think the biggest fear of a detector manufacturer would have to be a truly standardized way of testing depth....one where the sink rate of the coin, soil mineralization, moisture level, ect. was all controlled.

I think the biggest factor in a detector purchase for most is what a machine capable of...this most often equates to depth. You have excuses that some cook up....for example, the Etrac is too heavy...I don't know about you, but I would carry around a 20 pound detector if I knew it could hit deep silver that a 2 pound detector had no chance of seeing.

Sad thing is that none of the marketing departments of the manufacturers would ever allow their machine in a standardized test. I guess that's what these forums are for. lol.
 
Top