Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Deus 2 HF2 Coil Bootcamp videos
- Thread starter squirrel1
- Start date
Hf 2 use data only.
Alight,
Here are some numbers.
Using the ID behavior and using tone break feature behavior to call targets before digging.
These targets were all reporting in gold ring range using 29 kHz channel 0 (one hunt I used channel 1 on the detector.
Areas hunted were 2 parks, 1 playground adjacent to freshwater beach, 2 church yards, 2 house yards.
I rewatched all video last night of the in the wild hunts using this process calling targets as digger or no diggers.
A total of 201 targets located in gold ring range. Super high percentage of these targets were giving rock solid id when sweeping using the 29 kHz MF band.
156 of these failed. Meaning I called them no diggers for either a nickel or potential unbroken gold or junk ring.
No gold rings were found of these targets that failed. No junk rings were found either. Some partial corroded zincolns part of the failed targets.
45 passed.
I junk ring passed. Some square tabs, some pull rings with and without beaver tails.
Of all the nickels dug they all passed. Some can slaw was dug. One nickel that was dug was a 1943 war nickel. There were other nickels dug as well.
No gold rings dug.
Special note.
One Nickel was dug but failed yet ID behavior suggested possible nickel by way of id behavior. Use of single freq suggested possible ferrous masking hence tone break test failed. I showed this in camera. There were a few other detected targets I couldn’t rate due to potential masking as indicated by detector, these targets are not part of the 201 targets listed above.
A square tab was recovered where it failed due to masking exposed using singe freq. this tsrgrt could infact have been masked gold ring.
Could a person have used another model detector and did what I did above over these same buried targets? Hmm
IMO No!
PS
List above doesn’t not include targets outside of gold ring range.
I did dig a few higher conductors.
The videos the data is based on is available for all to watch.
Also keep in mind I did do some videos earlier only looking at ID behavior. This is before I discovered this behavior with Deus 2 using tone break using Multo tones. The targets located do this alone are not psrt of the targets listed above. Although I did like what I saw using just this process alone. Just not on square tabs and pull rings.
Alight,
Here are some numbers.
Using the ID behavior and using tone break feature behavior to call targets before digging.
These targets were all reporting in gold ring range using 29 kHz channel 0 (one hunt I used channel 1 on the detector.
Areas hunted were 2 parks, 1 playground adjacent to freshwater beach, 2 church yards, 2 house yards.
I rewatched all video last night of the in the wild hunts using this process calling targets as digger or no diggers.
A total of 201 targets located in gold ring range. Super high percentage of these targets were giving rock solid id when sweeping using the 29 kHz MF band.
156 of these failed. Meaning I called them no diggers for either a nickel or potential unbroken gold or junk ring.
No gold rings were found of these targets that failed. No junk rings were found either. Some partial corroded zincolns part of the failed targets.
45 passed.
I junk ring passed. Some square tabs, some pull rings with and without beaver tails.
Of all the nickels dug they all passed. Some can slaw was dug. One nickel that was dug was a 1943 war nickel. There were other nickels dug as well.
No gold rings dug.
Special note.
One Nickel was dug but failed yet ID behavior suggested possible nickel by way of id behavior. Use of single freq suggested possible ferrous masking hence tone break test failed. I showed this in camera. There were a few other detected targets I couldn’t rate due to potential masking as indicated by detector, these targets are not part of the 201 targets listed above.
A square tab was recovered where it failed due to masking exposed using singe freq. this tsrgrt could infact have been masked gold ring.
Could a person have used another model detector and did what I did above over these same buried targets? Hmm
IMO No!
PS
List above doesn’t not include targets outside of gold ring range.
I did dig a few higher conductors.
The videos the data is based on is available for all to watch.
Also keep in mind I did do some videos earlier only looking at ID behavior. This is before I discovered this behavior with Deus 2 using tone break using Multo tones. The targets located do this alone are not psrt of the targets listed above. Although I did like what I saw using just this process alone. Just not on square tabs and pull rings.
Ok,
More data here. This system won’t work on gold items that are not ring shaped. There are no dependable parallels seen sweeping these items. I witnessed same thing sweeping some non ring shaped non gold jewelry items as well.
Digging dude showed the gold items in video. I asked him to do this. I applaud him for his work here. He checked all using 29 kHz MF chsnnel 0 and 89 kHz MF channel 6 as well as looked at each with 120 kHz single freq. As long as folks are aware of this - is a good thing. He does show few gold rings in video as well. Results here didn’t surprise me one bit. This is the why behind the protocol I have been using and expecting to see on such unbroken gold rings in the wild ID wise as freq is changed. Moving from lower to higher using freq noted previously here.
An ole hick from sticks grand discovery using this coil. By a person whose actual looking for gold rings was very limited in the wild. Although I did find one with equinox in a park some years ago that read a tad below nickel ID
My perseverance testing and using this coil has paid grand dividends for the users of this coil if they see some of my videos or forum posts on this behavior. And a few others videos who are now starting to dig into this with their hf 2 coils. It may turn out this is the best use of this coil in the wild. Select digging for gold, platinum, or junk rings snd nickels. There is some behavior where even the $1, $5 gold coins as well as the 3 cent nickel coin could be locate and dug out of a modern trash site. I have not tested or seen anyone else test a $2.50 USA gold coins. I suspect it too may behave differently somewhat id wise when changing freq vs most canslaw, lead, etc.
Guess that old foam I used paid off huh!!
More data here. This system won’t work on gold items that are not ring shaped. There are no dependable parallels seen sweeping these items. I witnessed same thing sweeping some non ring shaped non gold jewelry items as well.
Digging dude showed the gold items in video. I asked him to do this. I applaud him for his work here. He checked all using 29 kHz MF chsnnel 0 and 89 kHz MF channel 6 as well as looked at each with 120 kHz single freq. As long as folks are aware of this - is a good thing. He does show few gold rings in video as well. Results here didn’t surprise me one bit. This is the why behind the protocol I have been using and expecting to see on such unbroken gold rings in the wild ID wise as freq is changed. Moving from lower to higher using freq noted previously here.
An ole hick from sticks grand discovery using this coil. By a person whose actual looking for gold rings was very limited in the wild. Although I did find one with equinox in a park some years ago that read a tad below nickel ID
My perseverance testing and using this coil has paid grand dividends for the users of this coil if they see some of my videos or forum posts on this behavior. And a few others videos who are now starting to dig into this with their hf 2 coils. It may turn out this is the best use of this coil in the wild. Select digging for gold, platinum, or junk rings snd nickels. There is some behavior where even the $1, $5 gold coins as well as the 3 cent nickel coin could be locate and dug out of a modern trash site. I have not tested or seen anyone else test a $2.50 USA gold coins. I suspect it too may behave differently somewhat id wise when changing freq vs most canslaw, lead, etc.
Guess that old foam I used paid off huh!!