I understand people want to understand their detector - which is something I preach on any model - but at times, the information being sought makes one step back and scratch their head . . . . .
As Henrik has stated, based on his testing, there is no one frequency that works better than others due to the design of the Deus. Alain and his team have invested countless hours ensuring that the Deus does what they wanted it to and does it under a wide range of ground conditions, on a wide range of targets and across all four frequencies.
The comment about "
researching showing that the 18 kHz frequency is the one that works the best" begs the question . . . research where? The Deus is not alone when it comes to erroneous information that has been posted by people that have put on the expert jacket and posted information that in many cases is not only incorrect but confuses readers and results in less performance than had the preset programs been used with no changes.
[attachment 300089 MustBeTrue.jpg]
NOTE: Not trying to poke at the poster of this question or any specific forum but we shoudl all step back and digest the material that gets posted . . . . taking everything as gospel tends to produce uncertain results at best . . . . . . I thought the picture would add a little humor to the post. Remember the line in Men In Black when they picked up the National Enquirer . . . and said that was where the real news was published
The frequency you select should be based on the ground conditions at
YOUR site and the targets that
YOU are seeking . . . . If you are still learning the machine, understand the controls before you start loading programs others have posted . . . . some work and others have settings that make little sense when you look at the overall product. Understand the functions and you will be able to discern what might be worth trying and what isn't.
And as a side note, great post Henrik . . . . always enjoy seeing what you have come up with to enhance a great detector
Andy