You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
khouse said:I run manual as high as I can. Usually between 26 and 30. Manual is always deeper. I'm not aware that the tracking is disablred in manual mode? Maybe I missed it in the manual?
sprchng said:I think there's several points that one could make here but the most likely is that few realize that going to manual disables the ground tracking on the etrac. When one toggles back in to auto and the machine begins tracking again , an object close to the coil at the begining of the sweep could easily be read as mineralization and canceled out. That is an awfully small test garden. He needs to repeat the test but remove the target while re-reading the ground and then replace the target and see what happens.
I read frequently about people runniing these high sensitivity settings and find that's difficult in my soil. In addition , if your soil changes frequently and you're running in manual you could easily be running way out of balance with the ground. I always make a point of toggling back and forth often when using manual just to "taste" the ground now and then; in my dirt it's not uncommon to see a rec,sens. number that varies 12 to 15 points.
sprchng said:I think there's several points that one could make here but the most likely is that few realize that going to manual disables the ground tracking on the etrac. When one toggles back in to auto and the machine begins tracking again , an object close to the coil at the begining of the sweep could easily be read as mineralization and canceled out. That is an awfully small test garden. He needs to repeat the test but remove the target while re-reading the ground and then replace the target and see what happens.
I read frequently about people runniing these high sensitivity settings and find that's difficult in my soil. In addition , if your soil changes frequently and you're running in manual you could easily be running way out of balance with the ground. I always make a point of toggling back and forth often when using manual just to "taste" the ground now and then; in my dirt it's not uncommon to see a rec,sens. number that varies 12 to 15 points.
sprchng said:Here's how the etrac ground balances:----from the manual
E-Trac has three internal signal channels (high,
medium and low) used to identify targets.
E-Trac continually measures the magnetic
ground interferences that affect these
channels and adjusts the level of Sensitivity
individually for each channel, to provide the
most stable Target ID for each channel.
Most ground types cause some interference
and E-Trac uses this to adjust the detector to
the correct Auto Sensitivity. Auto Sensitivity
may not work well on a beach, as they do not
typically contain magnetic materials.----------
When you go to manual you are ignoring these settings and assigning arbitrary numbers to all signal channels. If the ground changes , the settings don't like they do in auto and you have affectively disabled the tracking system , hence the false readings.
the important difference between Auto and
Manual is that all of the channels are set to
the same level in Manual and if set too high
may cause unstable Target IDs.
For example, if the Suggested Sensitivity
determined by the detector is 15 and you
set Manual Sensitivity to 20, all channels are
set to 20. If one channel is affected by the
ground conditions then Auto would normally
reduce the level for this channel. In Manual it
is not reduced and stays at 20 so the ground
interference may cause false signals and
unstable Target IDs.
There was a video. I'm not seeing it now? I guess I must of broke a rule.Hopskippy said:This is a very interesting test.
I'm wondering if you veteran etrac'rs are seeing this kind of result when actually in the field?
What are you guys thoughts on this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53hOrH74w0I
roadapple said:Seems like sprchng is caught in " sprchng sie deutche " Let me see........how did he put it ? Oh yes....."You have fully exposed him now !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!innochiosprchng said:I think there's several points that one could make here but the most likely is that few realize that going to manual disables the ground tracking on the etrac. When one toggles back in to auto and the machine begins tracking again , an object close to the coil at the begining of the sweep could easily be read as mineralization and canceled out. That is an awfully small test garden. He needs to repeat the test but remove the target while re-reading the ground and then replace the target and see what happens.
I read frequently about people runniing these high sensitivity settings and find that's difficult in my soil. In addition , if your soil changes frequently and you're running in manual you could easily be running way out of balance with the ground. I always make a point of toggling back and forth often when using manual just to "taste" the ground now and then; in my dirt it's not uncommon to see a rec,sens. number that varies 12 to 15 points.