Mike Hillis
Well-known member
This was being discussed on another forum and I want to copy my post here as well.
Regards the F75...In a nutshell, the confidence meter and the depth meter should not give conflicting reports. When they do give conflicting reports you know that something is amiss.
For example:
If you see a target give a medium or shallow depth reading, yet the confidence meter is low (1 or 2 bars), you know you have a deep, larger than a coin, target. Most of the time you will see this type of response on deep, smashed aluminum cans. You'll get a nice zinc target id in the low 70s, good audio, medium to shallow pinpoint (4" or so) but the confidence meter will show 1 bar.
Whenever the two graphs agree you can have strong confidence in the display output no matter what the number of bars being displayed. When the two graphs disagree, you then have to intrepret the results, keeping in mind that calibration is to US coin size targets.
Hope that helps.
HH
Mike
Regards the F75...In a nutshell, the confidence meter and the depth meter should not give conflicting reports. When they do give conflicting reports you know that something is amiss.
For example:
If you see a target give a medium or shallow depth reading, yet the confidence meter is low (1 or 2 bars), you know you have a deep, larger than a coin, target. Most of the time you will see this type of response on deep, smashed aluminum cans. You'll get a nice zinc target id in the low 70s, good audio, medium to shallow pinpoint (4" or so) but the confidence meter will show 1 bar.
Whenever the two graphs agree you can have strong confidence in the display output no matter what the number of bars being displayed. When the two graphs disagree, you then have to intrepret the results, keeping in mind that calibration is to US coin size targets.
Hope that helps.
HH
Mike