Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.
filters
- Thread starter chalky147
- Start date
....That's a very interesting question mate!!
The way I'm setup, I like to remove as much filtering as possible to make things run fast.
I have FAST ON. This switches off filtering and have DEEP OFF now as that has switched off more filtering.
If anyone else has any more filtering knowledge, I'd be eager to hear.
Gaz.
The way I'm setup, I like to remove as much filtering as possible to make things run fast.
I have FAST ON. This switches off filtering and have DEEP OFF now as that has switched off more filtering.
If anyone else has any more filtering knowledge, I'd be eager to hear.
Gaz.
so do i for the same reason,with trash density high which i think might add a filter as it says in the manual that u can sweep slightly faster.
when i find a prodctive area i change to low density and sweep much slower.the reason for asking the question is,because the electronic
experts maintain that more filters require afaster sweep speed to give the best results,hence less filters a slower sweep so knowing the number
that we start from will enable me to make a more considered opinion of what sweep speed gives the best results.hope that all makes sense to every one.
when i find a prodctive area i change to low density and sweep much slower.the reason for asking the question is,because the electronic
experts maintain that more filters require afaster sweep speed to give the best results,hence less filters a slower sweep so knowing the number
that we start from will enable me to make a more considered opinion of what sweep speed gives the best results.hope that all makes sense to every one.
I'm not 100% sure about this Gaz. Doesn't Trash Density High "push" the best signal out in form of a tone? In other words if you were in the presence of iron BUT there was a good target there also, its going to sound off on the good one.
I run mine in High all the time. I couldn't understand why I'd ever want that off...unless I specifically looking for iron, which in that case I'd just use the ferrous sounds and dig the deep low tones.
Again, I THINK this is right.
NebTrac
I run mine in High all the time. I couldn't understand why I'd ever want that off...unless I specifically looking for iron, which in that case I'd just use the ferrous sounds and dig the deep low tones.
Again, I THINK this is right.
NebTrac
