Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Golden compared against another - -

dahut

Active member
- - I went to the high school again today, to continue pounding one particular area of the grounds. I just started hitting it, twice in the last 4 days. So far I have pulled about $8 in change for about four hours effort. I have started calling it the "Piggy Bank," due to it's payout and gently sloped grade. I have gridded a section about 80' x 50' so far, and there is probably twenty times that much yet to do. Maybe more. I could be at it a while!

This time I hauled my trusty Golden and a new detector, the Fisher F70. I wanted to see how they compare. I didn't really expect them to be much alike and I wasn't let down - they are not. However there is much to recommend them both and they are more similar than one might think. In the end, I think there is room for both in the Dahut Arsenal.

For this comparison I'll use the 10 section scale devised used by Andreas Meyer. That said, lets take a look at the two detectors side by side.

1. Features
The Golden can't hold a candle to the F70 on features alone. It has an ALL METAL mode and an ED-120, progressive DISC mode.... there is no pinpoint mode. Coupled to the DISC mode there is an excellent notch arrangement and 4 tone audio ID. No LCD readout is offered. There are the normal SENSITIVITY and THRESHOLD controls, it takes one 9v battery for power and has a 1/4" phone jack. The ground balance is preset. That's about it
I'd give it a 7 on features.

The F70 has one DISC mode and one ALL MODE mode as standard... and a ton of other features. Everything from a large LCD readout to interlinked gain, threshold/pre-amp and SAT speed adjustments. It has six distinct audio ID modes, along with notching, a pinpoint control and even seven different operating frequencies. It takes 4 AA batteries. There are more features than I can list. On features alone, the F70 gets a 9.

2. Depth and stability
Okay, let's confess: The Golden is not a depth monster. Compared to the Fisher, it comes up short. I didn't wind it up today opting for a setting of "*" on the SENS control. Even so, the Golden is good for about 6-8" on a dime. It doesn't fail to hit good targets, mind you, but deep, deep targets are gonna be a stretch.
On depth, the Golden gets a 7.

The F70, on the other hand, is about as deep as you can make a detector, I think. With all those gain, preamp and ground tracking adjustments, you can reach 10-12" on a coin. I don't think the Golden will do that consistently, although I have gotten 10" on a quarter with it.
On depth, the F70 gets a 9.

There is a downside of all this gain and preamp stuff, though. At the settings needed to make the F70 go to it's limits, it is twitchy and nearly so unstable as to be unusable. Even at moderate levels, the tiniest bit of foil or wire will make it chirp and quiver.
Stability for the F70 is an 8 (and that may be generous.)

The Golden by comparison is rock steady, and hardly whimpers no matter how much you wind it out. And at the boost ranges, over good targets and not trash, it gets some respectable, if not stellar, depth as well.
Stability on the Golden? 9

3. Discrimination and Notch System
The Golden has progressive DISC and a notch system that, in my opinion, is accurate and plain hard to beat. It takes some practice to get it right, but once you get the tones and notch arrangement figured out, you can ID any pull tab or screw cap made, and/or blank out any you don't want to recover. It needs a notch accept function, but it's no big deal. The Fisher lacks that, too.
The Golden's progressive DISC is razor edged, and cuts off all normal targets with authority when set to reject them. Unlike the F70, with it's digital controls, you thumb the knob to manipulate DISC. The iron range tone ID alone is a worthy feature... every detector made should have this.
The Golden signals strongly over targets, and you don't have to strain to hear them.
DISC and notch on the Golden: 8

DISC on the F70 runs the scale from 0-99 and is very accurate at all practical depths. It has all the tone ID you could want and surpasses the Golden in audio choices. It is not so razor edged as the Golden, though, and I experience plenty of "creepers" - those targets that are set to be discriminated out, but aren't. It hits harder on nickels than the Golden which seems not to really like them. The notch on the F70 is kinda weird to set up and is of the in-or-out blocking type. It works, but it has none of the subtlety of the Golden. The F70 has a volume control, but a somewhat weak audio amplitude even at max volume.
DISC and notch on the F70: 8

4. Ease of use
The Golden is the hands down winner in this category. Few detectors are as simple to use, while still offering plenty of accurate information to help with your digging decisions. With only four knobs and two switches, this is total analog joy. You set a few knobs, flick a switch and you are off. The Golden rarely falls over when you set it down and it rests nicely against you while you pocket your finds.
Ease of use for the Golden: 10

The F70 is not as easy to use. It has a scrolling menu arrangement for control selections that isn't difficult, but it cannot compare to the Golden. It can drive you batty with the various sensitivity and preamp controls and you can spend some hunt time fiddling with these settings to get it to settle down. The F70 falls over at the least breath of wind; it's tiny "footprint" making it unstable. It doesn't want to stand up at all.
Ease of use for the F70: 8

5. Types of hunting that can be done with the detector
The Golden is best as what Mike Hillis calls a "cruiser." This means schoolyards, tot lots, parks and so on are it's forte. What some might call general purpose detecting. It's excellent DISC and notch features make it eminently suitable for this style of hunting. I have used it as a relic detector and the iron tone ID features are a real boon in this type of hunting. But it isn't really deep enough for those targets at the extreme depths. Prospecting is basically out, with its preset ground balance, ED 120 DISC and limited SENS. It is NOT waterproof.
Types of hunting choices for the Golden: 7

The F70 is touted as a coin, relic and prospecting detector and I feel it is good at at least two of them. With the narrow elliptical coil and many adjustments, you can turn it down and sneak around trash in the worst park. For relics, wind out the gain, boost the preamp and set it in slow SAT and I believe it will go as deep as you care to dig. I have no experience with the prospecting mode, so cannot comment. I have found more than my share of .22 caliber bullets with it so far, though. That ought to tell you something. The F70 is NOT waterproof.
Types of hunting choices for the F70: 9

6. Weight and balance
The Golden has a solid feel and balances slightly forward, biased towards the largish 8 x 9 epoxy sealed coil. It's weight is rated at around 2.5 lbs. It is so light and easy to swing as to be almost hardly worth mention.
Weight and Balance on the Golden: 9

Believe it or not, the F70 has the Golden beat in this category! It weighs slightly more than the Tesoro, at just under 3 lbs, yet it balances right on the "S" handle. The weight and balance even and there really is no contest. Winner - the F70
Weight and Balance on the F70: 10

7. Power consumption and operating costs
This is easy. Both rate a 10. The Golden uses one 9V battery that seems to last forever; Tesoro says it goes for 10 to 20 hours or something like that. It seems longer. The Fisher F70 uses four AA batteries and goes for 40 hours, rated. Neither one is worth quibbling over, so let's don't start.
Operating costs? What operating costs? Snag your batteries at the Dollar Store and get hunting!
Power consumption and operating costs for BOTH: 10

8. Build Quality
The Golden is built on Tesoro's familiar Micro Max platform. It is proven through years of use to be rugged, reliable and trouble free. There is nothing cheap feeling once you get one in your hands, although they appear a little toy like at first. The only weak spot I can detect is the strain relief on the cable connector from the coil. It has what seems a shoddy coil spring, which I've had break in the past. For the most part, though, it is not an issue.
Build Quality, Golden: 9

The F70 is kinda wimpy compared to the Golden. It just feels like you need to be careful with it, like it won't suffer much punishment. The LCD screen cover is a thin PVC sheet and is prone to damage. The coil is rugged enough, and the rods lock up well. But a sharp wiggle in the hand makes it all feel kinda unseated. I feel better after shrouding my F70 in bubble wrap and duct tape to help keep it from harm... I haven't felt the need to do it yet to this Golden.
Build Quality, F70: 8

9. Warranty
The Golden is a Tesoro. It has a lifetime warranty on the instrument, to the original purchaser. However in practice, Tesoro Inc., has a reputation of fixing any of their detectors, regardless of who currently owns it. This is a well deserved reputation. I've had a couple of Tesoro detectors fixed for FREE, even though I was not the original purchaser and the repairs, in one case, were major. The Tesoro people never batted an eye nor asked questions. As long as the instrument isn't abused or modified, their warranty on the instrument and their willingness to repair any of their units is untouchable.
Golden Warranty: 10

The F70 is warranted for 5 years to the original purchaser only. This is common practice in the industry and 5 years is a good long time.... longer than most, in fact. And they take care of you, no matter what, if you are the original purchaser.
But if you are not the original purchaser you are taking your chances. Sorry, Tesoro wins here.
On the other hand, Fisher-First Texas is making some major strides to improve and provide great service to their customers and their instruments. Their Service Manager, Mike Scott, has told me time and again, "We'll do what it takes to make our customers satisfied and keep them detecting." This doesn't mean they want a flood of requests from rascals looking to get something for nothing, but they are very willing to work with the customer. This is a great leap ahead of the old Fisher, in my experience.
F70 Warranty: 8, improving

10. Price and value
The Golden retails at $528 MSRP and hits the streets at about $423.20, dealer sell price. Personally, I think that at that price there are detectors which offer better performance and more features. But on the used market, with that untouchable warranty, they are hard to beat at around $250-$300.
Price and value new: 7

The F70 retails at $799 MSRP, with a street price of $649, dealer sell price. With all it can do and the near infinite adjustability, it is worth a lot. Is it worth $650? When you consider the Tesoro Cortes, Whites XLT, Garrett GTI 1500 or other high end detectors, it's competitively priced. Considering it performs better in tests than nearly all the competition, even some costing MORE, I'd say yes.
Price and value new: 8+

Totals
Golden - 93
F70 - 95

At no point in today's hunt was the F70 able to hit a target missed by the Golden. In many cases, in fact, the Golden hit them harder and without as much noisy chatter. Today's total was 61 coins for $3.01, a silver earring and a large wad of pull tabs and screw caps.

By no means does this indicate the Golden is the equal of the F70. It is not; in many arenas it is decidedly inferior. Given more field time with the F70, I suspect I will be willing to raise the score on the Fisher.
But for what it is, when used within it's limits - especially when it can be had used for a good price - the Golden just might be one of the best values available on the detector scene.
 
School yards, tot lots, etc. are my forte. I like the fact that my Silver umax can disassemble and fit into a Tesoro bag and carried on my shoulder. The pinpoint on the Tesoros because of the fast response makes pinpoint a non considere for me-I can usually pinpoint on the second sweep. The fact that the Golden can be operated at lowest disc with tones (and I think a/m mode) makes it more than enough detector for me. Now, dang it:rage:. I just gotta get one!:ranting:
 
The Golden shares all the features of the Silver, save one. It has no pinpoint function. To be fair, it doesn't really need one.
In return, it has something no Silver Series will ever have - tone ID and that super notch. I do gotta say, though, that it seems not to like nickels as much as other items. It hits them but not with the sort of authority I'd like. The best way to distinguish nickels is to mark the spot on the dial where they cut out and thumb to that point. With a little practice, you'll know if it is or isn't a nickel.
You can also get them with the notch function. In that mode, you can determine easily of it is a pulltab, foil ball or eraser tip - as they all cut out well before you ever get to nickel!

I'd also recommend you add o-rings to the DISC and NOTCH knobs, but keep them loose. You'll use these controls a lot and they need to turn freely.

Just keep trying to get one. Lots of people read something like this, get one and then decide they don't like the "noises" it makes. Or they decide it isn't deep enough, or whatever. Soon they sell it.
So keep after it.
 
Dave,very interesting and informative post.On your comparisons the F70 more depth,but in the field you stated that the Tesoro hit harder and there was no target missed by the Golden against the F70. Was your initial depth performance determined by an air test? Thanks Ron
 
Ron from Michigan said:
Dave,v ery interesting and informative post.
On your comparisons, the F70 more depth, but in the field you stated that the Tesoro hit harder and there was no target missed by the Golden against the F70.
Was your initial depth performance determined by an air test? Thanks Ron

Both. I've done air testing at home and they're not in the same league.

The Golden and the F70, AT THIS SITE, (the high school) were neck and neck. This is mostly because there arent any really deep targets here. But, as a test, when I raised the coils on each, with targets in the ground, the F70 would "out get" the Golden by a few inches. Remember I wasn't winding out the F70 in the least, running at midrange SENS and preamp gain at -3.

Yet, the audio on the Golden puts the F70 behind. It is louder and crisper. To aging ears, that matters.
 
Lets not forget that the Golden's all metal mode is a VCO non-motion all metal mode. Same as any VCO pinpoint mode. The only thing you can't do is de-tune. Other than that it works very well as a pinpoint mode when you need it.

HH

Mike
 
"...other than the tone and the notch, where is the Vaquero compared to the Golden?"

With those words, a mouthful has been spoken.
So, to answer your question, lets use the Meyer "Ten X Ten" scale.

1. Features
The Golden has an ALL METAL mode and an ED-120, progressive DISC mode.... there is no pinpoint mode. Coupled to the DISC mode there is an excellent notch arrangement and 4 tone audio ID. No LCD readout is offered. There are the normal SENSITIVITY and THRESHOLD controls, it takes one 9v battery for power and has a 1/4" phone jack. The ground balance is preset. That's about it
I'd give it a 7 on features.

The Vaquero has an ALL METAL mode and an ED-180, progressive DISC mode.... and a pinpoint mode. Coupled to the DISC mode there is a monotone audio. No LCD readout is offered. There are the normal SENSITIVITY and THRESHOLD controls, it takes one 9v battery for power and has a 1/4" phone jack. The ground balance is manually adjustable.
I'd give it a 8 on features... but only because of the manual GB

2. Depth and stability
Okay, let's confess: The Golden is not a depth monster. Compared to the Vaquero, it comes up short. When I don't wind it up, keeping the SENS around 8, the Golden is good for about 6+" on a dime. It doesn't fail to hit good targets, mind you, but deep, deep targets are gonna be a stretch.

On depth, the Golden gets a 7.

The Vaquero, on the other hand, is deep. It has sizable gain, and with the ground balance, you can reach 10" on a coin. It will test you to know it, though, since it also signals very quietly over the deep targets. You gotta think small, in tiny, inch-sized areas down at these depths.
The Golden is the same, and I have gotten 10" on a quarter with it. But after years of using both, I gotta give one more point to the Vaquero.

On depth, the Vaquero gets an 8.

Both are rock steady, and hardly whimper no matter how much you wind them out. At the boost ranges, over good targets and not trash, they both get some respectable depth. Add in the Hyper Tune option and that will increase a bit, hitting harder on deep targets. The trade of is they each get a little squirrely when you do that.

Stability on both: 9

3. Discrimination and Notch System
The Golden has progressive DISC and a notch system that, in my opinion, is accurate and plain hard to beat. It takes some practice to get it right, but once you get the tones and notch arrangement figured out, you can ID any pull tab or screw cap made, and/or blank out any you don't want to recover. It needs a notch accept function, but it's no big deal. The Fisher lacks that, too.
The Golden's progressive DISC is razor edged, and cuts off all normal targets with authority when set to reject them. Unlike the F70, with it's digital controls, you thumb the knob to manipulate DISC. The iron range tone ID alone is a worthy feature... every detector made should have this.
The Golden signals strongly over targets, and you don't have to strain to hear them. It hits small gold well. It runs quiet unless you have the iron tones enabled, then you hear the low honk ferrous items make.
DISC and notch on the Golden: 8

DISC on the Vaquero is handled by the reliable progressive method, controlled by one knob. It ranges from all metal up to coins, where it ends. You cannot run the DISC higher than copper cents. Because it is a ED-180 discrimination, it is more open on the iron end of the scale. It handles small iron well, when that is discriminated out. On the other hand, the Vaquero is an iron hog, having the tendency to call large iron good. The Golden doesn't share this latter trait.
It hits small gold and other low conductors well, due to it's frequency.
It runs almost too quiet for my tastes.... when they say Silent Search at Tesoro, they mean it.
DISC and notch on the Vaquero: 8

4. Ease of use
The Golden is the hands down winner in this category, but not by much. Few detectors are as simple to use, while still offering plenty of accurate information to help with your digging decisions. With only four knobs and two switches, this is total analog joy. You set a few knobs, flick a switch and you are off. The Golden rarely falls over when you set it down and it rests nicely against you while you pocket your finds.
Ease of use for the Golden: 10

The Vaquero is a tad easier to use, given that it is monotone, beep and dig for the most part. We will now see a gaggle of people pipe in and contend otherwise. And you can twiddle the DISC knob and make a reasonable TID detector out of it, but it pales in that mode compared to the Golden. Not even close, really. With the Vaquero, you adjust the GB, set the DISC and THRESHOLD and take off.
Ease of use for the Vaquero: 10

The Vaquero has a push button, VCO pinpoint, which I like. It re-tunes so fast, unfortunately, as to be near unusable. The Golden doesn't have a dedicated pinpoint function at all, so you switch to all-metal to pinpoint. It also re-tunes too fast.
In my perfect world, every detector made would have a VCO style, slow re-tune, TRIGGER pinpoint... so they both fall short on that score. But it is of little matter with these two. They pinpoint in DISC mode just fine. I'd like to argue over this, but I won't. I'll call it a draw


5. Types of hunting that can be done with the detector
The Golden is best as what Mike Hillis calls "cruising." This means schoolyards, tot lots, parks and so on are it's forte. What some might call general purpose detecting. It's excellent DISC and notch features make it eminently suitable for this style of hunting. I have used it as a relic detector and the iron tone ID features are a real boon in this type of hunting. But it isn't really deep enough for those targets at the extreme depths. Prospecting is basically out, with its preset ground balance, ED 120 DISC and limited SENS. It is NOT waterproof, so avoid in-water hunting at the beaches.
Types of hunting choices for the Golden: 7

The Vaquero is touted as a relic detector and I feel it is best at that. On the other hand, it is a good multi-use detector if you like monotone detectors. That is the kind I started with, a Silver Sabre II some years ago. Many still swear by this type of instrument.
With the nice Tesoro coil and it's small receive coil, you can turn it down and sneak around trash in the worst park. Get the small 5.75" coil and it gets better, with little depth loss.
For relics, keep the stock coil, wind out the gain and THRESH and I believe it will go as deep as you care to dig. It also likes those iron EO's one finds so often while relic hunting, so be mindful of that. The Vaquero is not waterproof, so avoid in-water hunting at the beaches.
Types of hunting choices for the Vaquero: 7

6. Weight and balance
The Golden has a solid feel and balances slightly forward, biased towards the largish 8 x 9 epoxy sealed coil. It's weight is rated at around 2.5 lbs. It is so light and easy to swing as to be almost hardly worth mention.
The Vaquero has a solid feel and balances slightly forward, biased towards the largish 8 x 9 epoxy sealed coil. It's weight is rated at around 2.5 lbs. It is so light and easy to swing as to be almost hardly worth mention.
Weight and Balance on both: 9

7. Power consumption and operating costs
This is easy. Both rate a 10. The Golden uses one 9V battery that seems to last forever; Tesoro says it goes for 10 to 20 hours or something like that. It seems longer. The Vaquero? The same.
Operating costs? What operating costs? Snag few 9V alkaline batteries at the Dollar Store and get hunting!
Power consumption and operating costs for BOTH: 10

8. Build Quality
The Golden is built on Tesoro's familiar Micro Max platform. It is proven through years of use to be rugged, reliable and trouble free. There is nothing cheap feeling once you get one in your hands, although they appear a little toy like at first. The only weak spot I can detect is the strain relief on the cable connector from the coil. It has what seems a shoddy coil spring, which I've had break in the past. For the most part, though, it is not an issue.
Build Quality, Golden: 9

The Vaquero is the same as the Golden
Build Quality, Vaquero: 9

9. Warranty
These are Tesoro's. They have a lifetime warranty on the instrument, to the original purchaser. However in practice, Tesoro Inc., has a reputation of fixing any of their detectors, regardless of who currently owns it. This is a proven and well deserved reputation.
I've had a couple of Tesoro detectors fixed for FREE, even though I was not the original purchaser and the repairs, in one case, were major. The Tesoro people never batted an eye nor asked questions.
As long as the instrument isn't abused or modified, their warranty on the instrument and their willingness to repair any of their units is untouchable.
Warranty on both: 10

10. Price and value
The Golden retails at $528 MSRP and hits the streets at about $423.20, dealer sell price. Personally, I think that at that price there are detectors which offer better performance and more features. But on the used market, with that untouchable warranty, they are hard to beat at around $250-$300.
Price and value new: 7

The Vaquero retails at $525 MSRP, with a street price of $420.00, dealer sell price. For virtually the same money when new, it comes down to what you want a detector to do. Also, there are very few detectors from other manufacturers that share it's gut basic operation. Like the Golden and all Tesoro detectors, it holds it's value very well at resale, normally achieving 60%-75% of new price when resold. It's 'raison d' etre' is depth in a simple package.
Price and value new: 8

Totals:
Golden 83
Vaquero 86

The Vaquero is more akin to a relic detector and is what I think of as 2nd generation UMax. Tesoro calls it "H.O.T.", for High Output Technology. Of course they would, needing to hype it up to increase sales. It is almost identical in performance to the Tejon, although it runs quieter.
The Vaquero and the Golden are really an apples and oranges sort of comparison, but they do complement each other quite well.
Me, I like some good target ID features for "cruising" around town and other urban sites. The Golden gets the nod at these times.
When I get out in the toolies and deep plowed fields I want to have more ooomph and can dispense with the ID features. The Vaquero does nicely here.

Personally, I'd like to see the Vaquero given tones and notch, and so made into a Super Golden. I've been saying that for years, and it seems to fall on deaf ears over there in AZ. That's okay - I like them both as they are.
 
Dead right, Mike. You can switch to all metal for pinpoiting and thats likely why Tesoro stuck the control where they did.
 
Enjoyed the write up and it seems to agree with what I've found. I prefer the Golden for fresh drops and coins under 5 inches.
 
Excellent post! The Golden is a good machine and although it's not a high end detector it still has it's place. I've made some pretty incredible finds with mine. Although it's only a backup (use it primarily for lunch hunts) it hits hard on low conductors (and dimes?) as any high end detector I have ever used. My only complaint is that the 2 high tones are to close together. The Golden is a love it or hate it detector. I still have mine (in the back of my truck as we speak) and just can't seem to let go of it. When used with the 5.75 concentric coil its a tot lot killer!

Ray(Ca)
 
Ray(Ca) said:
Excellent post! The Golden is a good machine and although it's not a high end detector it still has it's place. I've made some pretty incredible finds with mine. Although it's only a backup (use it primarily for lunch hunts) it hits hard on low conductors (and dimes?) as any high end detector I have ever used. My only complaint is that the 2 high tones are to close together. The Golden is a love it or hate it detector. I still have mine (in the back of my truck as we speak) and just can't seem to let go of it. When used with the 5.75 concentric coil its a tot lot killer!

Ray(Ca)
I let go of mine some months ago - and instantly regretted it. I have since sold one of my others (my beloved Garrett GTP 1350 :( ), in order to replace the Golden. This one will stay!

Anybody have a nice GTP 1350 for sale?? :)
 
Excellent post. Very informative. However, since the Golden does not like nickels how would you expect it to respond to gold which is close in the same conductive range?
 
Tseeker said:
Excellent post. Very informative. However, since the Golden does not like nickels how would you expect it to respond to gold which is close in the same conductive range?
I fear I misled you - such is the power of the printed word!
I was comparing the Golden to a very accurate TID detector, remember. By comparison, the Golden hits differently on nickles. I don't know what that difference is; something in their design, perhaps. I found that with te F70 when it says 29-31, you've found a nickel. With the Golden, you gotta work them nickel signals.

As to your question, I would expect the Golden to respond to a gold target like a nickel. I did not mean to imply that it DOES NOT respond to nickels, it does. But nickels tend to be a little contrary and often do not "bang" in as hard as you would expect such a large, coin-sized object to do.

I found 9 of of them today with the Golden, in fact. Some were obvious, strong hitters. Others, however, were "iffy" and hard to label as nickel at first response.

The trick on nickels with the Golden is to use the notch function. The tone is there, of course, and once you get that, you go to the "NARROW" notch mode and isolate the nickel range. It is one of the subtleties of the instrument that long time users are accustomed to.
Once you have isolated the nickel range this way, you dig any target in that ID range that repeats, even if it is a little scratchy or bouncy.

The downside of this is the Golden can isolate ANY target in the midrange, and so one tends to get carried away with all this "processing."
The danger here is you begin telling yourself: "Oh, that's a large-ring pulltab, with small tail. I dont want to dig another one of those."
The Golden can refine midrange ID that closely, if you learn how to use it

So, what I do is process nickels as suggested here, and then dig everything else in the midrange that signals cleanly and repeatably.
 
Dahut, that was a very well thought out and informative answer, I like my vaquero and compadre the more I use them, My XLT is still my go to machine mainly cause it will tell me how deep to dig.I also like the tone ID.some of you have said that you can tell how deep the target is with the tesoros but I haven't gotten that used to them yet. but soon I hope I will be able to.
I keep reading posts on the site trying to learn more.
thanks to all of you that give us new guys the information we need to go out and find that hidden treasure.
HH
:pulltab:
 
Some of you have said that you can tell how deep the target is with the Tesoros, but I haven't gotten that used to them yet. But soon I hope I will be able to.
Here's something to chew on - hope it helps

The depth response of detected targets is based on signal strength, of course. The farther from the coil antenna the target lies, i.e., it's depth in the ground, the lesser the response amplitude will be.
The Tesoros keep to that and so offer amplitude modulation, ie, the audio response signal strength you hear on deep targets falls off in strength. In other words, shallow targets hit hard and deep ones give a softer, quieter response.

Since is more than one way to skin a cat, there are two other ways depth can be associated with audio response. Garrett, for example, uses a shorter duration response on deep target, as opposed to modulated audio. Their instruments give a clipped 'blip' on deep targets instead of a long 'bong,' while the amplitude stays the same for all target responses.

So with the Tesoros, you listen for solid, repeatable tones that are quiet and sometimes even near the edge of response. This is one reason why good headphones are a must!

Now, we go back to the relationship of signal strength to depth for the second depth measuring method.
Most old timers will know it as the tried and true, "Coil Lift" method. Simply raise your coil as you scan over the target!
Deep targets that meet the other criteria of solidity and repeatability will stop signaling right away, as the coil retreats away from them. Shallow ones will continue to beep even when you have the coil well above the ground.
 
Just too good...LOL
You just raised the resale value of the Golden's.....
Now everyone wants one................I've never tried one,,,hmmmmm:hot:
 
Top