Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Has anyone done a comparison of the Kruzer vs AT pro

M

mtdoramike

Active member
Curious what the differences of the two machines are? I owned the Garrett AT pro and hated it. The machine it's self was ok, but the headphone and coil connectors were a real pain to get off and on. To me, I would love to find a universal machine for both and hunting and water hunting, which I thought the AT pro would fit the bill, but it didn't for me anyway. So I'm considering the Kruzer versus a dedicated water machine like the Tiger Shark since I live in central Florida and travel to the Islands quite often.


mike
 
I own a v3i and a makro kruzer. I think you will like this unit
 
Had an AT Pro, didn't like it much. I have the Multi Kruzer and a Tesoro Tiger Shark. I'll be selling the Tiger Shark in a couple of weeks. The Kruzer IMHO is a much better detector for my type hunting. (Old home sites, ghost towns, railroad sidings, and fresh water)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top