Has anyone done a comparison of the Kruzer vs AT pro

[mtdoramike]

Curious what the differences of the two machines are? I owned the Garrett AT pro and hated it. The machine it's self was ok, but the headphone and coil connectors were a real pain to get off and on. To me, I would love to find a universal machine for both and hunting and water hunting, which I thought the AT pro would fit the bill, but it didn't for me anyway. So I'm considering the Kruzer versus a dedicated water machine like the Tiger Shark since I live in central Florida and travel to the Islands quite often.


mike

 

[mtdoramike]

-- moved topic --

 

[Justme]

I own a v3i and a makro kruzer. I think you will like this unit

 

[doc holiday232]

Kruzer Much more versatile--3 freq.,waterproof,quality build.

 

[Tom Slick]

Had an AT Pro, didn't like it much. I have the Multi Kruzer and a Tesoro Tiger Shark. I'll be selling the Tiger Shark in a couple of weeks. The Kruzer IMHO is a much better detector for my type hunting. (Old home sites, ghost towns, railroad sidings, and fresh water)