azsh07
Member
Without getting super into all the differences....I am looking at either one. Now I have been detecting for 35 years so I have used most...but not either one of these. I sell off my stuff in fall usually and rebuy in spring so time to get a new unit for the year. I had the Fors Cor...it was fine...Makro Racer 2..it was good....but time for a new toy.
All relic hunting in Maine...iron is always around and lots of it. Need good depth as most stuff left is what others missed or too lazy to dig iffy.
I want the Impact Pro package as I like the coils better...i do not like big coils and do not want to have to buy a whole set of coils....so the Impact seems fine ....unless there is an issue. I do not ever hunt in water..never will until that is all that is left.
I also like a trigger switch underneath...my preference and the Impact has that.
So any reason the Anfibio or Kruzer would so superior in iron or depth. Small differences concern me none....usually small perceived depth differences never turn out to mean much in the field IMHO. Usually iron seperation or iron ID is 90 percent my focus...then depth...
Scott
All relic hunting in Maine...iron is always around and lots of it. Need good depth as most stuff left is what others missed or too lazy to dig iffy.
I want the Impact Pro package as I like the coils better...i do not like big coils and do not want to have to buy a whole set of coils....so the Impact seems fine ....unless there is an issue. I do not ever hunt in water..never will until that is all that is left.
I also like a trigger switch underneath...my preference and the Impact has that.
So any reason the Anfibio or Kruzer would so superior in iron or depth. Small differences concern me none....usually small perceived depth differences never turn out to mean much in the field IMHO. Usually iron seperation or iron ID is 90 percent my focus...then depth...
Scott