You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Mike Hillis said:The used market in metal detectors is pretty big. I know I would rather buy a used unit than a new unit, all things being equal just because of the money saved, which is often quite substantial. But the used market really hurts the dealers and mfg because they make their money from selling NEW metal detectors. The China scare could be just what the doctor ordered to limit some of that used detector market and all the mfg are trying to cash in on it. Fisher, Whites, Garrett, and Minelab are all saying the same thing, if you want genuine name with genuine performance, then you better buy new from an authorized dealer at the whatever the new price might be. Scare me into buying new and move me away from the used market, or the cheaper, developing bootleg or aftermarket.
What I would like to see is an unbiased (no mfg or dealer involvement) comparison between the OEM and the after market knock off. Is there really a difference besides just price? Dave Johnson with First Texas products commented on this once. "The question is really about how they perform." If they perform as good as the OEM but for half the price then the mfg have to justify their prices. Is the China scare really about performance or pricing? At this point we do not know because no one is trying to find out.
I hold this view because in the past I have worked for a so called bootlegger. We made and sold replacement parts from crankshafts and connecting rods, pistons and bearings for gas compressors and all for much more affordable prices to the customer. We had our own foundry, shops and sales force. The OEM's screamed and complained and tried to put all kinds of controls on the customer to keep them away from us, but the customer still chose us for the quality (equal to or better than OEM) and the prices which were often CONSIDERABLY lower than the OEM product.
I think the real issue is the\at China is making clones of equipment that is supposedly protected intellectual property, either by patent or by copyright. Which is also currently in the news and legislative halls.
HH
Mike
ak_1234 said:Stealing is stealing. It is wrong. They have not invested in the research and development, the advertising, the infrastructure that goes into developing, making and selling new machines. By copying products, including the logos and the name of the companies that they are stealing from, they are causing sales to be lost from the companies that have invested in developing new products. Every detector one buys FROM THE MANUFACTURER, allows more research and development to produce the next, better detector.
After market products (loops, spark plugs) are not a problem. The core machine is still being sold. Used machines are not a problem. Somebody bought it originally, and it helps to keep the hobby alive, the sales of that machine has already benefited the company. Stealing the whole detector and selling it as a White's when it clearly is not, is wrong. White's (Minelab's, Nike, name whatever company is being stolen from) does not get any benefit from this even though they have invested in the infrastructure that allows these thieves to make a killing because they DON'T have to invest in these other things and loses income to develop the next machine that you might have wanted to get if this goes too far. It is stealing, stealing is a crime.
Mike Hillis said:The used market in metal detectors is pretty big. I know I would rather buy a used unit than a new unit, all things being equal just because of the money saved, which is often quite substantial. But the used market really hurts the dealers and mfg because they make their money from selling NEW metal detectors. The China scare could be just what the doctor ordered to limit some of that used detector market and all the mfg are trying to cash in on it. Fisher, Whites, Garrett, and Minelab are all saying the same thing, if you want genuine name with genuine performance, then you better buy new from an authorized dealer at the whatever the new price might be. Scare me into buying new and move me away from the used market, or the cheaper, developing bootleg or aftermarket.
What I would like to see is an unbiased (no mfg or dealer involvement) comparison between the OEM and the after market knock off. Is there really a difference besides just price? Dave Johnson with First Texas products commented on this once. "The question is really about how they perform." If they perform as good as the OEM but for half the price then the mfg have to justify their prices. Is the China scare really about performance or pricing? At this point we do not know because no one is trying to find out.
I hold this view because in the past I have worked for a so called bootlegger. We made and sold replacement parts from crankshafts and connecting rods, pistons and bearings for gas compressors and all for much more affordable prices to the customer. We had our own foundry, shops and sales force. The OEM's screamed and complained and tried to put all kinds of controls on the customer to keep them away from us, but the customer still chose us for the quality (equal to or better than OEM) and the prices which were often CONSIDERABLY lower than the OEM product.
I think the real issue is the\at China is making clones of equipment that is supposedly protected intellectual property, either by patent or by copyright. Which is also currently in the news and legislative halls.
HH
Mike