shelton7522
New member
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr89LN3tz2A[/video]
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Nauti Neil said:It does'nt matter how fast the electronics are if you are doing tests with objects "in air".I have very old machines that will pass these tests with ease.....technology that is 30 years old......processing speed like that of the kruzer is nothing new.I also have cheap machines that will pass these tests with ease in air.
If you put two nails close together and a small coin in between under the ground,leave them for long enough to simulate "real" detecting conditions you will find that most detectors will fail to pick up the coin and the nail under the coin is even harder for a machine to pick up when its been under the soil for a long amount of time.
As i said,you can easily make a test bed yourself that shows what i'm saying is true.....nailboards do not simulate real detecting conditions in any way.