Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Not sold on 2 tone ferrous!

Digger said:
BeachBumm said:
But doesn't this defeat the advantage of being able to hear a cond target next to a Fe masking it? I mean, we are taking our machines back out to areas where have have grided in multi-tone (MT) cond and now in 2-tone (2T) Fe we are hearing these new sounds hinting at cond targets in and among the Fe.


Actually, switching from Ferrous tones to Conductive tones (or vice-versa) doesn't do anything to increase or decrease target masking. It is simply a matter of whether you want to hear the audio response associated with the target(s) ferrous properties or hear the audio tone associated with the target(s) conductive properties.

OMG! Wow! I never understood the difference between Co and FE until now....and it was really bothering me. Thanks. Now I understand perfectly!!!
 
Not to but in on all these pros..on a thread forgotten, but..aren't every CO and FE target pre-scanned for size and then fit onto the fe-co scale by minelab? since there is no metallurgical analysis occurring?
 
Top