Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Part 1 evaluation of the Nokta FORS CoRe

Monte

Well-known member
Here comes another new detector model to the market … ?????

[size=small]I am going to be posting this evaluation in 2 parts. This is Part 1, and it will be posted in two places: At Findmall.com under the Nokta/Makro Forum, and at AHRPS.org under the General Metal Detecting Forum. Part 2 will be posted when weather arrives that will free my favorite ghost towns and other old-use sites of snow and ice so I have access and comfortable weather to hunt them.[/size]

All too often I’ve seen a new detector hit the market, but after pouring over the product information they don’t leave me with very much interest. If it is a new offering that might appeal to a beginner or newcomer I’ll check to see how it compares with the vast array of offerings we have now.

If it appears to have a price point and/or features to compare with a mid-level detector, then I am even more drawn to check it out. That would be a price range where a serious ‘Hobbyist’ or even a more ‘Avid Detectorist’ might be shopping … and that includes me.

Often the higher-dollar detectors, those with a single search coil and in ‘basic’ standard form that are priced well over $1000 in USA terms, usually are less appealing to me because, quite often, they get too gadgety, have too many adjustment options that can bewilder even a more savvy detector user, and frequently are more for ‘flash’ and lack much improvement in serious all-purpose performance.

Then suddenly, along comes a detector that appears to be a nice ‘fit’ in a shopping budget for the serious or avid detector user, and also shows itself with what appears to be quality in workmanship, fit-and-finish, and ample adjustments for versatile performance … but without a lot of flash and fancy. That’s the type of detector I like to look for, and that’s exactly what I saw in the Nokta FORS CoRe.

I enjoy versatility, and due to the challenges I face at most of my preferred sites, I also tend to favor smaller-than-stock search coils. What I saw in the FORS CoRe ‘Pro Package’ interested me, and that is exactly what I received and have been evaluating.


Ready for some surprises?

The Nokta FORS CoRe [size=small](which stands for Coin & Relic)[/size] is going to surprise anyone who sees the unit, then makes their first grab and start to work it because it balances so wonderfully! Balance is surprisingly good, and the weight is also much lighter than the outward appearance suggests.

The FORS CoRe comes with a standard 7X11.[size=small]2[/size] Double-D search coil, and operates at 15 kHz. It has four [size=small](4)[/size] search modes, and it powered by four [size=small](2)[/size] AA alkaline batteries.

With a Suggested Retail of $999in the USA, this detector competes very well with other detectors in the upper-end of the mid-priced category. Actually, in doing some in-the-field work with friends using some higher-dollar detectors, the Coin & Relic competes very favorably with detectors boasting a much higher MSRP!

In addition to the ‘standard’ Nokta FORS CoRe , the ‘Pro Package’ includes the following items.:

Two extra search coils. A smaller-size 4.[size=small]7[/size]X5.[size=small]2[/size] Double-D in a solid-body housing, and a larger-size 13.[size=small]3[/size]X15.[size=small]5[/size] DD. Like the stock coil, the larger coil is in an open-frame design.

Also, all three search coils come with a nice coil cover installed. Personally, I am not a big fan of coil covers and never really use them as there is no need, but these are great because they are thin, therefore they don’t add much extra weight, and they fit snuggly.

These extra search coils, impressive mounting hardware, a finds pouch, rechargeable batteries with charger, and set of headphones come in an excellent quality bag with the rods, control housing, and armcup.

The multi-pocket bag has a comfortable handle on the side to carry the entire outfit when broken down, and has two wide, firm and cushioned straps should you want to back-pack everything. This bag, alone, is a better design and quality built product than I have seen from any other detector manufacturer.

Zipping everything open and inspecting each part reflect the same appearance and feel of the whole product as being durable, well thought out, and ‘functional.’ It was only a welcome hint of what to expect once the detector was assembled and put into action.

Assembling my Nokta FORS CoRe was mostly straight forward and simple with the exception of the armcup and control housing. Nothing about the CoRe is cheap or of sloppy, ill-fitting design. Instead, everything fits together quite snuggly.

The armcup is metal, not plastic, and is attached to the upper rod with two bolts and nuts. Even the choice of these simple parts is impressive as they have excellent size/shape bolt and nut ‘handles’ to grip and tighten. Where the challenge came, with my unit, was attaching the control housing to the armcup.

The housing has a top-mounted metal bracket with ‘rails’ that very snuggly fit into the bottom brackets on the armcups, and either one rail was fractionally a little oversize, or one armcup grooved receiver was fractionally smaller. By ‘fractionally’ I mean my control housing does not slide fore-and-aft in the armcup’s groove.

Instead, I had to firmly press it into one armcup groove then mate the other armcup so I could get the joined parts aligned with the holes of the armcups and upper rod, insert the bolts and tighten the nuts. Once completed, I was very satisfied with the very solid, wobble-free design, and also glad I had it all together and wouldn’t have to do it again very soon. :)

Once assembled I did quite a bit of in-house testing to get comfortable with the FORS CoRe adjustments and physical design, making sure I had the rods adjusted for a proper and comfortable length so the search coil was being worked about 12" to 18” in front of my feet.

It took me a couple of days to do some bench-testing against a number of detectors I own or borrowed.
Then, the ‘Oh Shucks!’ moment arrived. It’s early-to-mid January, cold, and we have been hampered by freezing fog, freezing rain, and just sporadic drizzle for a few weeks. More wet weather than normal for this generally drier region.

There I was, ready to head out to start some field work and deal with the elements and figured I better put on the environmental gear. Do you know what that means?

I had to remove the bolts & nuts and each armcup and the control housing to fit the environmental cover over the housing then re-attach all the parts … again. :( It was easier the second time, but still …. The EC for the handgrip is very simple to install. Fit it down over the top and close the zipper!

The manual states the battery life with 4-Alkaine AA batteries is approximately 20-25 hours. On my first set of batteries, using only the speaker for indoor testing and so friends could hear what I was hearing for about half the run-time, and either my Pro Star or Killer B ‘Wasp’ headphones for the second portion of time, I didn’t clock it closely, but I know I exceeded 25 hours.

The Nokta FORS CoRe has one feature that I will definitely be using once hot summer weather arrives because I rest up in the shade in the heat of the day and do most of my detecting very early, very late, or after dark when it is comfortable. I may not use it continuously, but I’ll have to put in more dark o’clock hunting to find out, but that is a built-in LED flashlight. Located in the handgrip in front of the display, it is activated by a small rocker switch above the Pinpoint trigger. It shines the light just about on the search coil area.

This detector also has a ‘vibrate’ feature so a detectorist can feel a vibrated response should they be hearing impaired. My hearing isn’t totally gone, but it sure isn’t like it once was and I lost most hearing in my ruptured right ear in an on-the-job accident in 2010. I have toyed with the Vibrate function a little just for fun and to experience the five different levels of adjustment. It’s definitely a functional feature.


Add batteries … Press a few switches and touchpads … Hang on for a ride!!!

Installing the 4 batteries is simple and you only have to make sure the polarity is correct.

My FORS CoRe came with the red membrane adjustment touchpads, but to be honest, I don’t see where the former rocker switch design wasn’t just fine. A friend of mine said he might even prefer the rocker switches, and I kind of think they could be operated a little easier with the EC in place. Maybe.

At the rear of the housing is a ¼” headphone jack with a stout rubber plug, and an On/Off rocker switch.

On the front of the housing the two cable connectors secure the search coil and the handgrip-mounted switches, display and flashlight. I have not seen any sturdier and tighter-fitting cable connectors in use since maybe the old military-grade connectors used on some of the BFO's back in the ‘60s. The cables used are also thick and quality feeling, and of proper length so you don’t have a lot of excess cable to deal with.

Also on the front of the control housing is a rocker switch for the Ground Balance option. You can turn ‘On’ an Auto-Tracking GB function, or to turn it ‘Off’ which will allow the operator to use the automated GB [size=small](often referred to as Ground Grab or Fast Grab on other brands)[/size], or to manually GB the FORS CoRe. Three GB options to satisfy any detector user.


Four common search modes, but some adjustment functions have different names.

The Nokta FORS CoRe has four search modes. One is a Threshold-based All Metal mode, and the other three are all motion-based Discriminate modes. The modes and their function are labeled as follows.:

GEN … This is your General or All Metal search mode.

DI2 … Which looks like D12 but it is really Di2, describing a Discrimination/2 Tone Audio response. In this mode, if all or some iron targets are accepted, they will generally produce a Low [size=small](bass-like)[/size] Tone. Non-ferrous and more conductive targets will produce a High-Tone audio, and this response also incorporates a VCO [size=small](Voltage Controlled Oscillator)[/size] circuit that will increase the pitch along with the loudness as the target is closer to the search coil.

DI3 … Or Di3, is a Discrimination/3-Tone Audio response, assigning the Low Tone for most Iron/Ferrous-based targets. A Mid-Tone for low-to-medium conductivity targets such as foil, US nickels, pull tabs, most gold jewelry and targets that fall in that conductivity range. And a High-Tone audio for the higher-conductive targets, such as most US clad and silver coins. US pennies, depending upon their date and alloy make-up, will fall in either the Mid-Tone or High-Tone range. This mode does not incorporate a VCO audio response.

COG … Means Conductive Ground and is designed for places like salt water beaches and lakes, and alkali sites when they are also damp or wet. This mode is also referred to as the Beach Mode due to the GB range and offsets to handle the low-conductive wetted salt effect. It uses the same 2-Tone w/VCO Audio like the Di2 mode.

To start hunting is simple, just select the search mode you want to use, make the adjustments you feel comfortable with, select Auto-Tracking or Automated/Manual Ground Balance, then GB the CoRe and start searching.

The menu is easy to follow and adjust, and the Owner’s Manual is very well written so even a novice should be able to learn and understand this detector in a very short period of time.

The Nokta FORS CoRe is designed and shipped with factory default settings in each search mode that are designed to help deal with some of the more common challenges we might encounter, and in my opinion is really set-up for a more experienced detectorist and not a new-to-the-sport beginner.

I say this because the two main-use search modes are likely to be DI2 and DI3, both of which have a factory default Discrimination level of ’10.’ On the Nokta FORS CoRe, they use the term ID Masking for what we generally call Discrimination. On the coming-soon Makro Racer, they changed the term to ID Filter.

I don’t know what the factory default setting is on the Racer, but the ID Masking of ‘10’ is to help Discriminate rocks and some iron. Therefore most iron targets, to include nails, are going to produce a response. The ID Masking adjustment range goes from ‘0’ to ‘99’ so the operator has more than enough adjustment range to find an ID Mask setting to Discriminate the primary bothersome targets.

Most iron will be rejected in the ‘0’ to ‘39’ range so an ID Mask setting of ‘40’ should reject most ferrous junk unless it is in a man-made shape that enhances its conductivity. Those types of targets, such as the annoying crimp-on/pry-off bottle caps, can be dealt with using skilled sweep techniques in most cases.

Other adjustment functions have more common names, such as Sensitivity, Threshold, Frequency, Tone, Volume, Vibration, Brightness, etc. Just learn the Mode names and understand that ID Masking is Discrimination and the setting adjustments come easily.

The full-information display is located on the left side of the control housing with the adjustment switches below it. As I stated, there are ample adjustment features that are best described as ‘functional,’ and this detector provides impressive and versatile performance without a lot of excess features that can easily confuse a person or result in really messed-up performance.

If the unit is too noisy and chattery, you logically reduce the Sensitivity until it is stable. If you are hunting very close to metal structures or in a very densely littered area, just reduce the Sensitivity. On the other hand, if it is smooth running and you would like to try to get a little more depth, just increase the Sensitivity level.

Warning: The default Sensitivity level is ‘50’ on an adjustment range from ‘1’ to ‘99’ and you might think the default setting is way too low. Depending upon the search coil you have mounted and the ground and target environment at the site you’re going to hunt, you might be surprised how well the CoRe can perform at that default Sensitivity level. Yes, all of my saved mode settings have it higher, but not maxed out. Find the setting that will be most comfortable for you ‘on average’ and then tweak it up or down a little, if you feel the urge.

When making adjustments for any mode, you need to refer to the display panel on the left side of the housing where it shows each mode, available functions, and the settings you make. It will also display other information, such as the Ground Phase read-out, Target ID numeric value, Coin Depth, and other points of interest.

The main information most detectorists want to see during a search is the Ground Phase, a Target ID read-out, and Coin Depth. One of the nice designs of the FORS CoRe is the sleek handle with a small display pod. When you Ground Balance, or press-and-release the automated GB button by the handgrip display, it will show the current Ground Phase reading.

When you sweep over a target that has a strong enough signal to process a visual response, you will see a Target ID numeric value based upon conductivity. If you squeeze the Pinpoint trigger, the display will show an approximate Coin Depth. All of the readings are large, bold numbers that are very easy-to-see.

I frequently remind people that there is no such thing as a ‘perfect’ metal detector, so I always like to remember to point out strengths, but not ignore what I consider to be a weakness. The Nokta design of the FORS CoRe was quite good in providing us a very clear and readable display.

One of the better points to mention is that the handgrip display is easy to view at any time, day or night. That’s because when a target is encountered or you activate a Pinpoint switch or GB pushbutton, a display backlight comes on, and the user can adjust the backlight from ‘0’ [size=small](no backlight)[/size] to ‘20’ for a very intense lighting. My saved settings are ‘10’ which is sufficient for me to clearly see the handgrip display.

One negative, if it really bothers a person, is that in the Pinpoint function the Coin Depth reading is in centimeters, not inches. To me it isn’t a really big deal as I very seldom use Coin Depth read-outs as they are most often not quite close to accurate. I do use them to get a general idea of a possible depth ‘range’ and not expect a specific reading.

In this modern day of Internet access, I am sure most readers have, or will, visit the manufacturer’s website where they can view the detector, see the features and read about what it offers, so in many ways, an evaluation and review such as I am doing doesn’t really need to focus on all of the detector package we see.

However, in working on this product review I think it is important for me to point out things that I feel many beginners to more experienced hobbyists might want to be aware of, such as the Coin Depth read-out. There are a few others things that I really like about the FORS CoRe and fell it is important to convey to readers who are interested in what this newer-to-the-market detector could offer them.


Good Points I Really Like.:

• If I want to “start from scratch,” it is easy to restore the factory default settings of all modes.

• Better yet, it is easy to make the adjustments and find settings that you are comfortable with, then easily save them to memory. That sure eliminates a lot of fumbling around with different modes and functions at every start-up. I like detectors with a memory capability.

• It has a very quick automated Ground Balance, as well as the ability to easily tweak it just a little bit manually when I feel the need.

• The rod-locks are good sized and snug up well, there’s no looseness or wobble in the coil or rod system, and the mounting hardware for the search coils and arm cup/control housing are impressive.

• The DI2 search mode with dual-tone and VCO audio is a search function I really enjoy using. I will say that using VCO audio, for many newcomers and especially old timers who haven’t had much experience with it, will probably take a fair amount of field time to get to understand and appreciate. Once learned it can convey a lot of information about a target, and it can help pick good targets out of some trashy sites, primarily when it is iron trash.

• I found the DI3 Discriminate mode to also be pleasant to use. I do NOT like to hear a lot of multi-tones on most detectors with the only exception being my White’s XLT, but is only sees occasional use. All of the 5 tone, 7 tone, 9 tone, it-doesn’t-matter tone offerings kind of annoy me. I like a good single tone. Prefer a 2-Tone audio that helps separate ferrous from non-ferrous. And I like the 3-Tone concept with the breakdown Nokta used, for ferrous, mid-range and high conductors. Simple, and I like ‘simple.’

• With my impaired hearing I also found the 5 different Tone settings helpful as I can match an audio tone I find pleasant and distinctive for the different headphones I use.

• As mentioned, the weight is definitely not an issue, and the balance and feel are more than comfortable, especially since I deal with a really bad back, neck and shoulder. When summer arrives and I hit some places where I have a purposeful use for the larger search coil I will get the opportunity to see how I can endure that set-up, but for all of my typical day-to-day detecting, the FORS CoRe isn’t a big burden.

• The standard 7X11.[size=small]2[/size] Double-D search coil is not just a rugged-feeling coil, it balances comfortably and works well. What has surprised me even more is how well the smaller DD coil, the 4.[size=small]7[/size]X5.[size=small2[/size], has been working in the trashier [size=small](mostly iron)[/size] places I have been able to get to in our wintry weather.

[size=small]Reader Alert: I'm aware many people who know me personally or have read my posts through the years know that I generally favor a Concentric designed search coil. Well, I do, especially IF it is of a good size, like somewhere between 6” and 7” in diameter, AND IF the detector I am using performs well with a Concentric coil.

Not all detector designs do well with both types of search coils. I do like the 5” DD Excelerator coil for the White’s MXT family models, and I wouldn’t be without my 5” DD for the Teknetics Omega. My old Compass models have standard DD coils, too, but there are some detectors, or some particular DD coils, that just do not work well or appeal to me.

So, for some, it might come as a shock that I like these DD coils on the FORS CoRe. I do for one very ‘simple’ reason … they work, and they work well. ‘They’ being both the DD coils and the Nokta detector circuitry design.[/size]


Just a few reminders about how the FORS CoRe functions.:

The FORS CoRe will turn-on in the DI2 search mode. This is the most powerful or sensitive Discriminate mode.

By design the FORS CoRe is a moderate to fast sweep detector, and it has a very quick response so make sure you learn the sweep speed limitations for the search mode you use and the site being hunted.

With both an Auto-Tracking or Automated/Manual GB option, choose the method you prefer and be sure you are Ground Balanced at the site before you start searching. GB is an important function to perform to get the best all-around performance from any detector.

If you press the GB pushbutton to bob the search coil to GB, you are shifted from a Discriminate mode into the GEN All Metal mode. You have a few moment pause before it returns to the search mode you were using, or you can just pull-and-release the Pinpoint trigger for a quick return.

Here’s a quick review of my saved-to-memory settings [size=small](which I can alter and save changes at any time)[/size] for the different search modes based upon the mostly urban sites I have been hunting.:

GEN.. Sensitivity-‘80’ .. Threshold ‘40’ .. Volume ‘20’ .. Tone ‘3’ .. Brightness ‘10’

DI2.. Sensitivity ‘85’ .. ID Masking ‘22’ .. Volume ‘20’ .. Tone ‘4’ .. Brightness ‘10’

DI3.. Sensitivity ‘85’ .. ID Masking ‘22’ .. Volume ‘20’ .. Tone ‘4’ .. Brightness ‘10’

COG.. Sensitivity ‘85’ .. ID Masking ‘40’ .. Volume ‘20’ .. Tone ‘3’ .. Brightness ‘10’

Do I suggest you use the same settings? No, of course I don’t. This was just to let you know what I happen to prefer, right now, and I might make some changes when weather allows me access to the old sites I prefer to hunt. There are reasons why I use the settings above, just like you’ll have your own reasons or preferences.

I know I could go on and make this long Part 1 Evaluation even lengthier, but I think you all have an idea about the Nokta FORS CoRe already. After I’ve had a few weeks to hunt some of my favorite ghost towns stage stops and other places in Eastern Oregon, Nevada and Utah, I’ll make a Part 2 Evaluation post.

It will deal mainly with the specific strengths and weaknesses I might find when searching those very littered locations, and by then [size=small](by mid-March I hope)[/size] I hope to have a Makro Racer in-hand as well. That will let me give some added information about how both the Nokta FORS CoRe and Makro Racer compare in side-to-side performance.


Closing Comments .. An invite to come see the FORS CoRe .. And my Keeper/Not-so-Exciting decisions.:

Before I got the FORS CoRe in-hand it seemed to have some similarities to the Teknetics line, especially the T2. If you’re used to a Fisher F75 or most White’s models like the MXT All-Pro, then you’re used to the US 5¢ coin reading with a much lower Target ID number, whereas the FORS CoRe has them in the ‘56’ to ‘58’ ID range like the Teknetics Omega, G2 or Fisher Gold Bug Pro and F19, etc. So for some hobbyists who are used to one set of Target ID [size=small](VDI)[/size] numbers, it will take a little time to adapt to the higher read-outs from the FORS CoRe. Since I used both Teknetics and White’s detectors, it came easier.

Other than the Coin Depth reading in cm there were only a couple of negatives I had, but I won’t discuss them here as it is something I presented to the folks at Nokta to be aware of.

We know that only KellyCo is handling the Nokta Detectors in the USA so you can't go and see them at a local dealer’s shop. If you happen to live in the greater Portland Oregon area, I’ll share this invitation to attend our Free-to-the-Public metal detecting group meeting on Saturday morning, February 14th. You can find location information for the meeting in the Announcements Forum at the ahrps.org site, or you can shoot me an e-mail to monte@ahrps.org and I’ll get back to you.

I know that the 14th is Valentine’s Day here in the USA, but this is a morning meeting and presentation, allowing you ample time to take someone out for a special dinner in the evening. Come and see the FORS CoRe, find out what it can do and get to feel the balance and performance.

Only YOU can decide if any detector is a Keeper or Not-so-Exciting. Come check it out and make up your mind. I know I have, and it actually took a bit longer than a detector often takes when I evaluate them. I have a fair number of detectors, some listed below and some not.

I have them to use in seminars to show what we have had and what some good detectors are capable of. I also use them as loaners from time-to-time. And all of them get put through my Nail Board Performance Test and a few other challenges as well as used afield.

As a rule I keep my main three or four detectors with me in my vehicle all the time for all my travels and searches at a variety of sites. It has been the White’s MXT Pro then All-Pro as the #1 all-purpose detector w/6½” Concentric for trashier sites, and the past year the 9” Concentric spider mounted for more open-area searches. The White’s MX5 took the place of the M6 and Teknetics Omega as being the #2 use detector, but often first-grabbed because it is lighter and handier with my bad back. It sported the 6½” Concentric coil mounted full-time. I also have a Tesoro, either the Outlaw or Bandido II µMAX w/6” or 7” Concentric coil, and sometimes the White’s XLT for cruising open areas.

The Nokta FORS CoRe is definitely a KEEPER.

It has impressed me so much that I have now positioned it on the back seat as my #1 all-purpose detector. I hope to get a Makro Racer in-hand soon because I anticipate the performance will be very similar to the FORS CoRe.

With the performance I am now enjoying with a little less back fatigue, I plan to keep the smaller coil ready when I get a spare lower rod for it and one for the larger coil. I have no doubt, after what I have enjoyed in performance and with the versatile adjustments these two models offer, that the Makro Racer will occupy the space next to my FORS CoRe on the back seat, and it will have a smaller coil mounted full-time making it the grab-and-go detector I will first grab for most sites I hunt. The Nokta will be set with the standard DD mounted to search the fringe areas of ghost towns or to hunt plowed fields, and other open areas etc.

We each get to make up our own minds and my MXT All-Pro in inside on my detector rack, and soon the MX5 will join it. The rack is for all the good models that I have for ‘back-up,’ loaner, or instructional purpose. Getting "back seat billing" is reserved for my Primary-Use Detectors.

That’s how impressed I am with my product evaluation of the Nokta FORS CoRe.. Not just that it is a good detector that folks ought to check out, but it is an exceptional detector that moved into the top spot for me.

All I need now is:

1.. Warmer and drier weather.

2.. A Makro Racer Pro Package.

3.. Extra lower rods for both Racer and FORS CoRe extra search coils.

I now have a New #1 All-Purpose detector, and to be quite honest I figured it might not be a bad detector, but I didn’t expect it to do so well on my bench test scenarios and continue to out-perform one of the best, most versatile detectors on the market. However, in most comparisons, it did.

I guess I really need to add one more item to my list, other than a new Racer Pro Package, and that is a new camera so I can get photos to post. Nokta & Makro. Names we haven’t been that familiar with, but I am sure we will see more of in coming months and years. The product quality and performance is right on par with their involvement and attention to the activity on their Findmall Nokta/Makro Forum.

Okay, off for some detecting …

Monte
 
Thank you Monte for the in-depth review. We appear to have similar tastes in detectors. Even though I have a FORS CoRe it is always instructive to see a detector from another perspective and you have given me a couple things to think about.

I want to take the time here to just say thanks in general. There are a very, very few people on the internet that I not only pay attention to, but have Googled and read most of their stuff. Why? To learn. I have learned a lot from you and I really appreciate it. Best wishes to you and yours in 2015!
 
Thanks Monte for the informative post. Your opinion counts heavily with us and I know Nokta appreciates it. Can't wait for part 2.
 
I do believe we have a lot in common as I have also followed a lot of your posts and website.

[size=small](By the way, I know it's winter but I hope you like ice cream as those are root beer floats. I've never smoked, drank or used drugs so beer is out. ;))[/size]

Six years after I started in this hobby I bought two detectors. That was 1971 and since then I have always owned many more than that, and have been rather selective on which models I settled on as my 'detectors-of-choice' to keep in the vehicle in my travels. I can be quite particular about what makes the cut because the bulk of the sites I pick to hunt are usually brushy, often challenged by building rubble, and the litter is always going to have an ample percentage of iron, especially nails.

There are times I might take a 4th detector along on an extended trip for specific use, but I've been comfortable maintain three detectors that provide me the best versatile, functional use for the sites I hunt. Weeding them out can sometimes be easy, and most recently difficult. I had to do more side-by-side work than I thought, almost doubting the performance I was getting, but in the end the FORS CoRe is definitely quite a value in both packaged design and field performance.

Some models, as noted below, hang around because I still like them, even though one below is going to be sold or traded. I had an F75 but didn't like it as much as I did the Teknetics T2's I had, but I found them to be comfortable in physical design, yet they fell short on TID/VDI lock-on compared with most detectors I used. Even their own Omega was more than a match for the T2 on accuracy on mid-depth targets and below. I let the 75's and T2 go a while back because they still didn't compare well with the MXT All-Pro.

I wish my health was better so I could put in the nugget hunting time like I used to, and if so I would make a trip over to join you somewhere, but I don't hunt well when someone around me is busting-a-gut laughing really hard. With my bad back and terrible balance, even with my cane I know some good nugget sites would have me falling down. It wouldn't be for entertainment purposes, however. :rofl:

Like you, even though the Nokta is an excellent performing detector and I know it will see a lot of use, I like to have more viewable information in front of me. Information such as the Makro Racer displays, and with the sleek packaging, display info, and the hope that the Racer will come close to matching the FORS CoRe in general performance, I am certain that it will be a model I will be using a lot, especially since it will be teamed up with the CoRe.

As usual, I look forward to your continued posts here and elsewhere, and 'Thank You' for the excellent contributions you've been putting on the Nokta/Makro Forum to help others.

Monte
 
Monte,
Thanks so much for your detailed and interesting review. I am keeping my fingers crossed that the Makro Racer will perform very similar to the Nokta Fors CoRe.

I appreciate the work you put into this review, and your willingness to share the results with everyone.
 
Briefer, but have more detailed report of just how well the FORS CoRe is handling an assortment of older sites. By the way, when I always mention I hunt 'ghost towns,' I have been doing so since May of '69 and in all that time I have only searched 3 or 4 that still had any structures standing. I don't usually visit the towns we frequently see in books from the library or Arizona Highway, etc., as those would have been the most obvious and most visited and most hunted since the start of the detecting hobby.

Nope, the old ghost town sites that I like to visit might have some building rubble, perhaps some visible foundations, and ample debris. Especially iron nails from old structures that were torn down or that burned down, so being able to handle iron nail environments has always been an important need for a detector/coil combination to handle. There are a few old town sites that took some detecting in open deserts or plowed fields to find any remains and start mapping where the town actually existed as there were no structures, foundations, roads, pathways, or other viewable signs.

Anyway, it is those old town sites that have beckoned me for many years. Over four-and-a-half decades now, and while they are not as plentiful as they started out, with a good detector and coil and proper technique, mixed in with a little patience, they can still produce. I know my FORS CoRe is up to the task as it has already shown me its abilities, and I really hope the Makro Racer makes a great compliment to it. I think it will. :thumbup:

I will leave on my first scouting trip to some homesteads and old school sites I have researched, probably about February 16th, and some might be in a better weather zone. March 1st or so I will be taking a week-long journey to sites every so often, and we have an open invitation for an informal get-together ghost town outing starting May 16th. I'll post more information on the ahrps.org Announcement Forum soon, but anyone is welcome to join the casual gathering as we have at least 5 ghost town sites we will be hunting, and our 'base camp', so to speak, will be Wendover, Nevada.

By then I am sure I'll be very comfortable with both the Nokta and Makro detectors. :twodetecting:

Monte
 
willing to share my experience and opinions in the hope that maybe someone might learn something new and helpful that will prolong their enjoyment of this great sport as I have. Naturally, I read a lot of posts by savvy detectorists, too, because I am always wanting to learn more myself.

Like you, I think everyone is going to find a lot of impressive performance from this joint company team. They obviously listen to the forum readers, and in time they will have more consumers to share comments about their products. As for the Makro Racer, if it isn't close to the quality of workmanship and electronic design and end performance we see with the Nokta Coin & Relic model, then I would be very, very surprised. I am certain the Racer will set a solid mark in the detecting industry, and I can't wait to have my own in-hand and out-in-the-field.

Monte
 
Monte thanks for the great evaluation, however, it is making my decision tougher lol I want to get one or the other machine. I was leaning towards the Racer, but having talked with you and read your evaluation, the Fors CoRe might be a tough machine to beat. But I , like everyone else, am hoping that the Racer will have the same ability or close to the Fors CoRe.

Looking forward to Part 2 and I also hope in the near future that you will also get the opportunity to evaluate the Makro Racer too. Well at least it is still winter so I still have a bit of time left to make a decision on which machine to get.
 
how much time you put in hunting stage stops and ghost towns and homesteads, like I enjoy, and seeing all the great things you have found in the last year-and-a-half on the ahrps.org Relic & Old Site Forum [size=small](where you go by 'pulltabs')[/size], all I can say is this.:

Your signature shows that you have one heck of a current detector arsenal. All of them are detector models I have personally used a lot ever since the day each model was first released, and every one of them have served me quite well. There is no way I would tell you that any of the detectors you have and use ought to be discarded as being inferior. They aren't. However, I am going to say that they have some very tough competition in the Nokta Coin & Relic, and more than likely the Makro Racer works as well. If so, you'll need to nudge one or two of the models in your list out-of-the-way, or just add one or two new detectors.

I know you live on the Eastern Oregon/Idaho border, but if you can get a little time to treat yourself to a couple of days over in Western Oregon about February 14th, come on over and do some detecting and see for yourself what the FORS CoRe really is and how it works. You just might be adding one or two new tools to your signature.

Monte
 
Great write up Monte!

You have a real gift for expressing you thoughts into words!

And yes the Racer I feel will bring alot of performance to the detectorist for a more REALISTIC price.

Exciting Time's ahead!!!

Keith
 
Yes I plan on being there the 14th for the meeting. I might make a surprise visit even sooner then that. I bet LOL if I haul you down to the Pheasant Grill and let you order anything you want off the menu you might let me play with the Fors CoRe a bit. And if you negotiate hard enough I'll even toss in desert and Rootbeer :cheers:
 
First I better start with a correction to my Nokta FORS CoRe evaluation. I guess I was a bit tired and didn't refer to all of my notes. I was just re-reading my post on the ahrps.org site and caught an oversight from not proof-reading before I posted. Sorry. :surrender: I made the correction on that site but can't edit it here, so please refer to the correction below in colored text.

Here is what I stated in the evaluation under ... Just a few reminders about how the FORS CoRe functions.:

The FORS CoRe will turn-on in the DI2 search mode. This is the most powerful or sensitive Discriminate mode.

Disregard that and replace it with the following.:

The FORS CoRe will turn-on in the DI2 search mode at first start-up with the Factory Default settings. You can restore all modes to factory Default at any time quite simply. Also, you can make changes to any of the operating modes while searching, and if you like the changes made, or you just want to design your own program settings, those can also easily be saved in a matter of seconds.

NOTE: If you make any adjustments, be aware of the final mode you are in after making the adjustments and then saving them to memory. Once saved, if you turn the detector 'Off' then the next tome you turn it 'On' it will start up in the last program you were in at the time settings were Saved to Memory.

For example, maybe you like to search in DI2, but you happen to be hunting a beach and are in the COG mode and decide you want a different Sensitivity level setting. You make the changes in the COG mode, like them, trigger to the search screen and use the Save-to-Memory steps and quickly those settings are saved. Finished at the beach, you head back to town and the next day you go out to search a park expecting to turn the FORS CoRe 'On' and be in the DI2 search mode. Nope, you're in the COG mode at 'turn-on' because that was the mode you were in last when all settings were saved.

Alert Reminder: If you have made one or more adjustment settings to any mode and want to Save-to-Memory, first return to the search mode you prefer to use the most, wave the coil over a target to make sure you hear you're in the proper mode, THEN do the steps to save the settings.

This is the most powerful or sensitive Discriminate mode ... by factory default design. It is possible to increase the Sensitivity and Volume of the DI3 or COG modes and reduce the Sensitivity and Volume of the DI2 mode such that the others will seem to perform better. Of course doing so wouldn't be a very smart move because, by design, the DI2 model should be set-up to provide the best depth and sensitivity in most cases.



Okay, back to some 'heads-up' reminders. Through the years we will read a forum post, a magazine article, or hear someone tell us in conversation that they use certain settings and almost make it sound like those are the best and you're nuts if you don't follow their strong suggestion. I'm not that way at all. I do express the settings I usually use and why, but that's just to know MY setting choices and I am comfortable with anyone picking their settings as they choose. I know some might not be very good and can lead to some good target masking, but those are their choices, not mine.

In my FORS CoRe evaluation I stated the following.:

Here’s a quick review of my saved-to-memory settings [size=small](which I can alter and save changes at any time)[/size] for the different search modes based upon the mostly urban sites I have been hunting.:

GEN.. Sensitivity-‘80’ .. Threshold ‘40’ .. Volume ‘20’ .. Tone ‘3’ .. Brightness ‘10’

DI2.. Sensitivity ‘85’ .. ID Masking ‘22’ .. Volume ‘20’ .. Tone ‘4’ .. Brightness ‘10’

DI3.. Sensitivity ‘85’ .. ID Masking ‘22’ .. Volume ‘20’ .. Tone ‘4’ .. Brightness ‘10’

COG.. Sensitivity ‘85’ .. ID Masking ‘40’ .. Volume ‘20’ .. Tone ‘3’ .. Brightness ‘10’

Do I suggest you use the same settings? No, of course I don’t. This was just to let you know what I happen to prefer, right now, and I might make some changes when weather allows me access to the old sites I prefer to hunt. There are reasons why I use the settings above, just like you’ll have your own reasons or preferences.


Notice that I said: "This was just to let you know what I happen to prefer, right now, and I might make some changes when weather allows me access to the old sites I prefer to hunt."

There are two reasons I had the Sensitivity Level set as high as I did/do in each search mode.

1.. I usually have a high Sensitivity setting, at or close to maximum, and if I have issues with EMI or other challenges, it is easy to adjust it downward to just get stabilized.

2.. Most of my favorite sites are frozen, muddy or snow covered so some of the places I have been searching have tall grasses on the hillside and the search coil was going to be worked several inches off-the-ground, thus I wanted a little extra uumph in my favor.

I have made a few subtle little adjustments today after I had a chance to work a couple of spots for a while in our foggy, chilly 37° weather.


GEN.. Sensitivity-‘90’ .. Threshold ‘40’ .. Volume ‘20’ .. Tone ‘3’ .. Brightness ‘10’

DI2.. Sensitivity ‘85’ .. ID Masking ‘10’ .. Volume ‘20’ .. Tone ‘4’ .. Brightness ‘10’

DI3.. Sensitivity ‘85’ .. ID Masking ‘20’ .. Volume ‘20’ .. Tone ‘4’ .. Brightness ‘10’

COG.. Sensitivity ‘90’ .. ID Masking ‘40’ .. Volume ‘20’ .. Tone ‘3’ .. Brightness ‘10’


The two main changes I made were a slight reduction in ID Masking in DI3, and a return to the factory default ID Masking of '10' in my primary search mode, DI2. Reasons? Sure, in DI3 I only want 'just enough' rejection to barely knock out iron nails, and that can be '20' - '21' - '22' and if I need to touch it up a little at a very littered site, I can. Also, I like to hear iron, unless it is just too terribly annoying and in abundance, so that I know iron is there than could cause good target masking and I can slow my sweep around iron in search of any nearby good target. In DI2 I enjoy the 2-Tone audio and love to search that way with other models I have.


A final 'heads-up' reminder, I stated this.:

Warning: The default Sensitivity level is ‘50’ on an adjustment range from ‘1’ to ‘99’ and you might think the default setting is way too low. Depending upon the search coil you have mounted and the ground and target environment at the site you’re going to hunt, you might be surprised how well the CoRe can perform at that default Sensitivity level. Yes, all of my saved mode settings have it higher, but not maxed out. Find the setting that will be most comfortable for you ‘on average’ and then tweak it up or down a little, if you feel the urge.

Trust me, at times a Sensitivity setting of even '50' can seem like too much, and don't think a reduced setting is going to be all that terrible. Work inside an old barn with a lot of metal farm equipment debris and you will love a very low setting I as did. I dropped it down to '10,' but just for fun I wanted to check a small patch of dirt in the corner area and reduced it to '1'. Yep, just plain old, single digit .. '1' .. and I could still get good hits on the little rivets and other dinky stuff in there, and none of it was very deep. Nothing over about 3" to 3½",

So, my personal settings are just that, MY personal settings, and I can make quick adjustments as desired. Find your own preferred settings, and definitely don't hesitate to tinker with the full-range of adjustment of the Sensitivity level. Quite an impressive detector, to be sure, and very functional yet simple. And as I have often stated ... I like 'simple.'. :thumbup:

Monte
 
Monte, you said you slow down around iron. The Fors CoRe manual states something about using wide deliberate sweeps (what ever deliberate means-aren't they all?) and avoid narrow sweeps. What was your experience as far as sweep speed and sweep width in heavy iron? As slow as a Minelab for instance? I know I have used Whites machines that respond better with fast sweeps and can miss targets when going too slow. As usual, excellent detailed reviews.
 
TabWhisperer said:
Monte, you said you slow down around iron. The Fors CoRe manual states something about using wide deliberate sweeps (what ever deliberate means-aren't they all?) and avoid narrow sweeps..
Let's refer to the FORS CoRe User's Manual first to see what they suggest, or try to decipher their interpretation of sweep speed to our personal interpretation because, in the end, that's what it is all about.:

Page 15: Discrimination 2 (DI2): [size=small](Mid-first paragraph)[/size] "In rocky or trashy fields, however, you can perform deeper searches by using the masking feature and sweeping the search coil more slowly (about one full right & left pass in 1 second).." ... Well, I know what was meant, but I believe that, technically, the description is incorrect. It says: "one full right & left pass in 1 second" and a right AND left pass describes making a sweep from left-to-right AND then making a sweep from right-to-left. I find it just about impossible to make "one full pass" [size=small](whatever that is)[/size] and return the other direction in only 1 second.

So it leaves a bit of interpretation for everyone to do. First, what is the definition of "one full pass?" I know some people sweep their search coils so fast that it brings about poor operator technique because, as a rule, the faster a person is sweeping the search coil, the faster their feet move. That means they are not making a proper methodical sweep coverage with efficient overlapping of the search coil. Typically, my own search coil coverage includes a side-to-side sweep of about 30 inches to 3 feet. I seldom make those often-seen big rainbow arcs with a long rod extension that might span anywhere from 5 feet to 6 or 7 feet. Very inefficient and fatiguing.

Second, that back-and-forth suggestion in only 1 second ought to read something like: "Sweeping the search coil more slowly and methodically at about 1 second from left-to-right, then repeat the slower sweep from right-to-left."


Page 15: Discrimination 3 (DI3): (3rd sentence.) "This mode is ideal to use in fields with different types of metals enabling you to search faster with audio discrimination." ... Now that statement is almost counter to what common practice would suggest. If you are hunting in fields, suggesting more open areas, then the targets might be less frequently encountered. But if I am working a site and "encountering different types of metals," then I can assure you I will be more deliberate, and that means a little slower and or shorter, more controlled sweeps, to try and isolate any favorable targets close to unwanted trash.


Page 25: Sweep Speed and Target Identification: "The FORS CoRe is a fast responding detector. When you detect a target with the FORS CoRe, in order to get an accurate ID of the target, instead of narrowing the sweeps and making quick sweeps over the target like in other detectors, you should make wider and deliberate sweeps. If the sweep speed is wrong, the device cannot identify the target accurately and the ID's may bounce around." ... Yes, I couldn't agree more that the FORS CoRe is a fast responding detector, and I really like that. I know some detectors have a slow and delayed response, then there are the 'average' quick-response detectors, such as the Teknetics Omega, Tesoro Bandido, White's IDX Pro. On the extreme s-l-o-w end might be the Minelab FBS models, and then there are the speedsters, and several detectors could fit in that group, with proper settings, such as a Teknetics T2, Fisher F75, XP Deus and ... my favorite of them all ... the Nokta FORS Coin & Relic.

But this section is also referring to getting a proper or more accurate, or a tighter and more consistent, Target ID read-out. As with many or most TID detectors, it really calls for a broader sweep and, due to the fast responding behavior of their circuitry, a little quicker sweep might be in order. By why? Two reasons. One is that the FORS CoRe responds so quickly that if you try a little short creepy crawl past a penny at about 2" or so [size=small](depending upon the coil mounted and settings used)[/size], you can hear multiple responses because the fast response AND EQUALLY QUICK AUTO-TUNE, is working overtime. A little faster sweep helps eliminate that which, in turn, will help produce better, tighter, more accurate Target ID numbers.

A second reason is that motion-based Discrimination is still reading and processing the ground signal as well as the target signal and things work more efficiently if you usually make a little broader sweep across the target and have the ground signal from the approach and departure.

However, not mentioned is the number and types of targets you might encounter in the span of the search coil sweep, and that must be taken into consideration. Then it is up to the operator to learn and master any detector in order to know the best coil to have for the site, and the most efficient settings AND search coil presentation to use for top efficiency. Translated, that means at some point we have to stop "going by the book" and rely more on operator knowledge of the detector, the coil, the settings and the site environment, then rely upon their search skills and techniques.


TabWhisperer said:
What was your experience as far as sweep speed and sweep width in heavy iron?.
Ahhh, and here is a key description of what we have to figure out from our own experience, and look back on Nokta's comment in Page 15/DI2 that read:

"In rocky or trashy fields, however, you can perform deeper searches by using the masking feature and sweeping the search coil more slowly..."​

I might 'slow down' a little in a trashy field, if the trash is dense, but when I hunt my favorite sites there are usually a lot of trash targets, often close together and 'good stuff' is mixed in with it Some of the trash in non-ferrous and we just have to recover it as if it were a coin, trade token, bullet, button, etc., etc. It's when I get into those very heavily iron infested sites that I need to make sure I am using a smaller-size search coil and making shorter and more methodical sweeps in and around all the iron debris.

As I stated, most of the time my sweep length is about 30" to 36", unless I am working a more open field that has few targets widely spaced, the I might make a little longer side-to-side sweep, and for me that's really about 4 feet across. Also, in the open areas I would be using a 'standard' search coil, like a 9" Concentric on an MXT All-Pro, an 8" Concentric on an Omega, or the 7X11.[size=small]2[/size] DD on the Nokta.

I base a lot of my 'experience' of coil and detector selection and set-up on years of experience, and I always rely on my Nail Board Performance Test to really sort the good-from-the-bad detectors for working iron plagued locations. The FORS CoRe with the small DD mounted works splendidly in just those types of tests or environments, and I can use what I consider to be a relatively slow sweep in dense iron nails, and once I get a favorable sounding hit, I can isolate it with a short but brisk wiggle.


TabWhisperer said:
As slow as a Minelab for instance?.
No, thank heavens. I have had 9 of the Minelab FBS models and I will never have another. They just do not work well for me and the types of sites I hunt most often, plus they are heavy and awkward, and I like a faster sweep, quicker recovery, and better Discrimination.


TabWhisperer said:
I know I have used Whites machines that respond better with fast sweeps and can miss targets when going too slow.
Models such as a White's XL Pro or XLT call for a more moderate to fast sweep speed, they have a longer auto-tune time, and their 4-filter technology has a longer "ring time" than the dedicated 2 and 3 filter types. You can get poor performance if you sweep them too slowly, especially if you haven't boosted the Signal Balance or Pre-Amp Gain [size=small](the same thing, just a different name)[/size], and they are best with a faster sweep.

The White's IDX Pro, picking on a model you have in your Signature, is an excellent detector to use in a dense iron nail environment because they have very clean rejection, and they are a 2-filter, slow-motion/quick-response design. They work like most Tesoro models, for example, and due to their circuitry design, they can not be used with a fast sweep speed in a highly mineralized environment, such as black sand in a volleyball court, pea gravel or a layer of small rocks.

Among the models on your list is the White's MXT Pro. That model just happens to be one of my all-time favorite detectors that is fitting for any type of hunting. Coin & Jewelry or Relic Hunting, and even Gold Nugget Hunting. Due to the 3-filter concept and circuitry design, they can be swept with a relatively slow sweep, yet can also search at a more moderate sweep speed. I have put my MXT Pro's and MXT All-Pro up against all sorts of detectors, to include the FBS Minelabs, the Deus, the T2 and F75 and others, and it has easily come out on top as the best overall performer ... for me and my needs at my choice of sites.

It has been my #1 all-purpose detector and that's why this evaluation took some extra time for me because I had to make a decision I didn't really think I would have to ... but the Nokta FORS CoRe actually bested my MXT All-Pro in several challenging comparisons, enough that it got more positive checkmarks from me and ascended to my #1 all-purpose detector, and a lot of that was because it provided me ample search coil sweep speed control for different tough situations.


TabWhisperer said:
As usual, excellent detailed reviews.
'Thank You', and I hope my evaluation update I posted earlier, and this response back to you have also be of some help. You're welcome to e-mail me at any time should you want a more personal and direct answer.

Monte
 
I think this page may be worthy of printing and carrying in my back pocket when the Racer is delivered. I wish I was retired and had more time to travel to your neck of the woods to attend some of the AHRPS events. I agree about Minelabs. I've had a love/hate relationship. When all was said and done I felt like I was detecting while drunk (DWD?). Outstanding TID but the delayed response combined with the weight just didn't work with my brain and body.

I used to have an original MXT but didn't like the single tone. The new Pro meets that multi tone need for me and I have my simple knobs and very effective machine again. I usually leave a Big Foot on the IDX. I do have the 8 and 6 inch coils for it and work those. The Big Foot gets coins down to 6 inches. Amazing setup. The XLT was the machine I was talking about needing a fast sweep. I actually acquired an old Compass XP and a used Tejon last summer but don't have much time on them. It was kind of a lost summer with a bad knee. I think I learn a little with each detector and it's just fun to change up once in a while.

I suppose Moore's Law is somewhat in effect with things continuously getting smaller, faster, cheaper. I've found the Deus is a great match for machines far larger, heavier and twice the price. I have always wondered if faster processors using less power would help the development of detectors. If the Racer delivers performance reports similar to the CoRe it will be an outstanding buy if not the best on the market. The Pro Pack was the logical choice for me.

Thanks for sharing your knowledge. I'm sure others will pick up a great deal from this thread.
 
compare it with the models you'll be bringing along. But only for comparison sake. I plan on using it at an old park or two so you'll be confined to your known and proven toys. But I'll let you tinker with it first that way while you are hunting, you'll be envious of what I am hunting with! :drool:

Matter of fact, bring along your 6½" Concentric coils AND your little 5" DD to compare with Nokta's -5X5+ coil.

I am heading off in a few minutes to check out one or two other potential sites to search next week before the group Detector Owner Rendezvous gathering. I'll check in when I return later on Saturday.

Monte
 
LOL well ya got the proven part correct.....M6 and MXT Pro. But what will be nice is I'll be there and if you get a beep just holler over at me and I'll sweep my coil over your target and let ya know if ya wanna dig it or not :smoke: But in all seriousness it will be nice to actually give the Fors CoRe a try. (even if it is only for a few minutes) Looking forward to finally getting it in my hands and then waiting until the Racer is released.
 
Monte

I read about your short affair with the X-Terra series about 7 years ago, back then you stated that the X-Terra replaced your main use MXT at the time. Then after the MXT Pro came about, it was your main use detector. Now it is the Nokta Fors CoRe that you are having a fling with, just wondering why and is the CoRe that much better than the MXT Pro? Signed.......Curious in Kansas

Randy
 
Top