Jim, see the other thread for a more lengthy explaination of why you might not have been able to hit that coin. Mainly, my money is on coil selection. The Pro Coil is a huge improvement over the stock 10" Explorer coil, and while IMO the 10" Tornado on the GT is a big improvement over those, it's still not as good as the Pro Coil or an SEF. The better seperation, ability to run at higher sensitivity settings, ability to handle iron or ground minerals better (with less nulling), and the seemingly improved depth of the 12x10 (thus far, with more tests to do) even at the same sensitivity setting as the stock 10" coil....All of these things can alter the results. One might think "Yea, but the SE or Etrac come with the Pro Coil, while the GT does not." True enough, but then again you can buy a GT and a 12x10 new and still be a bit cheaper if you think of it that way...Not to mention buying eithier the GT or the 12x10 used (either one).
I think of the Pro Coil as an upgrade to the Explorer or even the Etrac. Much of the improved seperation, less falsing, stability, depth, etc...to those machines I would give merit to the coil rather than some huge improvement in detector electronics. As I've said, the 12x10 on my GT feels like somebody sped up the clock speed of the computer. Improved seperation, quicker recovery, faster or more "reactive" target response with less coil movement to cross over and between targets, and so on. I bet some (I said "SOME") of the improved processor speed on these machines is more due to the coil's ability than anything else.
What I'd really like to see would be a GT with the 12x10 go head to head with an Etrac or SE with the Pro Coil. That's where separation and depth would really be interesting to read about. You have to promise me that when you do get around to buying a 12x10 for the GT (if you plan to?) that you'll compare some of these undug targets in the field with those coils going head to head.
Just the same, some times an explaination doesn't exist. Just like the Etrac hit that silver dime when the GT for some odd reason could not, there will be days when the reverse is true. Something as obscure as coil eddy current patterns of one coil versus the other can mean the difference between which catches a coin in it's "net" while the other has a harder time with it. Trash, ground matrix, mineral content, the coin being on edge in an odd way. All of those things can factor in to the mystery. I have read threads where guys have had trouble getting the Etrac or Explorer to provide stable target IDs at a site for whatever reason, while the Sovereign was rock solid and came up with the goodies. Like I said, whichever way the wind blows...
I'd once again say that sensitivity can be a very important factor. Raising it to the edge to try to get that coin to talk isn't automatically the best solution. Target ID can get erractic or even null even if the machine is stable. Factor in nearby trash or iron and I'm sure we've all heard that often riding sensitivity much lower in trash can often unmask coins better. When sensitivity is increased the coil tends to "light up" objects around it along with the desired target. This situation can often be more dramatic when the target is well less than fringe. A coin at 6 or 7" deep with nearby trash can reveal it's self much better with a lower sensitivity setting than a high one. As sensitivity gets higher the coil takes in more and more picture from the sides. That's why when I use the S-5 I often either hunt in Auto or with a fairly low sensitivity setting. I like to do this at spots where I don't expect silvers to be all that deep, 6 or 7" at the most (well within the ability of the S-5 even in Auto or with sensitivity riding real low). In situations like that my main concern is maximum seperation, not ultimate depth. With the heavy trash in such areas and typical packed ground conditons due to foot traffic the oldest coins are on average still only 5 to 7" deep. The strategy then is not to max out depth. If it was then I'd be using a larger coil. My main goil is optimum seperation ability. Yes, the S-5 is already doing that regardless of how high sensitivity is, but by taming down sensitivity I can increase the focus of that "laser" to an even finer point. Also, even excluding the impact of nearby trash, turning down the reach of that beam can often mean at least better target signals. One site in particular that comes to mind has all the above factors (heavy packed soil, 6 or 7" deep silvers, well over 100 years of trash). Along with those things this site also happens to have lots of tiny gravel and black sand/hot rocks. With less reach and width to the signal on the S-5 via sensitivity I'm also not stewing the target signal in as much ground matrix which can cost target quality.
There will be days, I guarantee you, when your GT will see a silver coin much better than the Etrac. Heck, even lessor machines I've used over the years have got me coins at sites that my other high end machines plain out missed. Why is that? Sure, some are probably due to me just plain missing them, while others I know I must have gridded over time and time again. Then again, some can be explained by masking iron in the soil that finally washed away enough to reveal the target mixed in with it. I once read a theory on this that makes sense. A guy related a site where he has worked with the same machine over the years. Ten years later with the same machine he's now popping "easy" silver out of this site. His only explaination was that rusted junk like old bottle caps finally broke down and washed away enough in the soil to reveal those previously masked targets for him. That makes sense, and gives further motivation to those who think everything has been worked to death and will never get better. Off subject, so my point is that one machine can and will get targets better or easier than other for any given reason on any given day. I really would have liked to see you're Etrac swept over that silver dime you found a month or two back that the GT unmasked next to junk.