You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Not very scientific.......too many variables.Grilled Scallops said:Lots of videos on youtube of people using the pro at the beach. watch the videos and interpret for yourself how deep the objects are.
Nauti Neil said:Not very scientific.......too many variables.Grilled Scallops said:Lots of videos on youtube of people using the pro at the beach. watch the videos and interpret for yourself how deep the objects are.
The only way to test depth is to test a detector on measured targets......but it seems people are reluctant to do this.I don't mind going first with my detector and if someone could do it with the tdi I can compare the depth properley........as long as the tests are honest.I believe people are reluctant to do this because they are worried about being dissappointed with the results..........no one wants to be outdone do they.![]()
TC-NM said:The tests done with all the machine's was very informative. There is on thing I noticed that could be of interest but not a issue in his testing. He taped the coins (nickels) using duct tape on the sticks then buried them.
Would it been better to attach the coins using a hot glue then bury them for at least a week?
I think that would give the target time to be saturated in salty wet sand. Thoughts?
TC-NM