Usually you see the posts about detector shortcomings once the actual detector / coil hits the street but it seems of late the complaints and fault-finding starts months before the actual product is released.
Rumors that take on a life of their own started by only knows who . . . . people reading things into facts that have been released by the factory that go way past what the engineers intended . . . . problems that are already assumed to exist . . . .
Seems like that was what was posted about features such as Minelab's BBS 20 years ago (yes there were forums then as I ran one

) or any of the other circuits / approaches to problems that people felt there was only one way to solve them and wrote off anyone that thought there was an elegant by simpler way to address the issues without doing a total rewrite of the designs.
Alain and his staff are avid hunters which is something many companies can't say about their teams . . . . and they know what issues we face and are looking for different ways to address them. The XP staff is not sitting at a bench in the lab developing circuits that only work in the lab . . . . they are in the field testing what they are designing and making adjustments to get the performance they are looking for.
In fact, at the last XP Deus Bootcamp we connected with Alain to get some first hand input from the man himself and as you can see in the photo, he connected to Aberdeen, MD from a beach on the coast of France testing the coil and software where they have black sand and salt water to deal with.
[attachment 322390 Alain.jpg]
XP listens to input and has a talented team designing their products so to toss in the towel saying that there is nothing worth waiting for is a tad short sighted . . . . . personally, what is yet to come is just as exciting as what the current Deus provides.
But as Rodney Dangerfield used to say . . . . . "
[size=large]Wow, tough crowd here[/size]"
[attachment 322392 Rodney.jpeg]