DirtDiggerDaveinMD
Member
What does everyone think of the Quantums? Why do you believe they were so unpopular? How do you feel that they would stack up against the XLT or the XL Pro?
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
I thought they balanced well, like most White's, and I thought the quality of workmanship was there, like most White's, but I found them to be "[u[]i]different[/u][/i]" from most White's and just not for me.DirtDiggerDaveinMD said:What does everyone think of the Quantums?
Maybe best to appreciate the fact that there is no "perfect" detector, and certainly not for more than one person.Critterhunter said:Monte, just like the good old days when you and I would bump heads on the QXT versus the Classic ID line.
Okay ... and there might be more than you thought.Critterhunter said:I'll start off soft by first pointing out what I agree on.
Yes, I forgot about that. The accept/reject audio for each segment as well as tone assignment. If it had variable discrimination .. OR .. a broader set of notch segments to allow the user to "fine tune" them, that would have been better.Critterhunter said:What don't I like about the QXT? First, it's inability to use variable discrimination and a variable notch. Yes, you do have 8 zones, all of which can be independently turned on or off, and each of which that can be assigned a high or low tone. ... the ability to bump a notch or disc knob into just the right spot is something I always wanted
Yes, we agree there as well, and the lack of decent VDI readings (numeric) was possible one of the biggest things I didn't like.Critterhunter said:I mainly hunt with nothing edited out anyway so I don't mind not having a variable disc/notch, but I sure would love to see the VDI # for splitting hairs on targets in a more easy fashion.
I wonder if it is related to ground mineral conditions where you are compared to where I am? I found the Quantum's (mind you I mainly worked with early releases) to NOT be very forgiving.Fine in low mineral, but most of the sites I hunted if I swept too slowly or too quickly I didn't get the kind of performance I wanted.Critterhunter said:I will disagree about the sweep speed. The QXT has the most forgiving sweep speed on any machine I ever used. It can go from ultra slow to ultra fast. I prefer a medium to fast sweep speed when hunting. The only place it needs a specific speed is on really deep targets. You need to do fast short sweeps to pull the proper ID out of it. master this and you'll see this machine getting deeper than most machines on the market.
If you are only getting that kind of depth then you either don't know how to set it up or how to use it properly.
Mike Hillis said:Critterhunter, you can call me uneducated in metal detector usage because you don't know me.