Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Whites VX3 Garrett Vortex VX9 Target ID Accuracy Video

jmaclen

Well-known member
I see a lot of requests for Garrett to step up and do a remake of some of the detectors that they acquired from their purchase of White's Metal Detectors especially the V series. Some have speculated that the Vortex V series is just that, a reimagining of the Whites V series.

Personally, I prefer the Whites V series color screen and some of the audio choices and I am a huge fan of mixed audio which sounds like an MXT.

I like the light weight, internal rechargeable battery, 3 tiered ferrous/non ferrous display, easy to see screen, simple to adjust features and waterproofing on the Garrett Vortex VX9. I am not a fan of its audio.

So, here is a video comparison between the VX3 and VX9 for low and high conductor US coin target ID accuracy in high iron mineralization dirt. Using a surface, 3" deep and 6" deep USA nickel and surface and 6" deep USA quarter for test targets.

Up averaging of target IDs and audio responses plus loss of depth is a given in high iron mineralization and common low conductor coins and trash can respond like high conductor copper and silver coin and jewelry targets. This can make selective digging really difficult even on shallow 3" deep low and mid conductor targets.

Due to the high magnetite content in the soil here, the Vortex VX9 ground balances at 96.75 on this dirt.

The test area is well established. The sandstone 1.5 inch slabs are local and they help to keep the test area uncontaminated from trash while also offering a buffer against the high magnetite levels in the soil. Without them, many VLF's coils will simply go into overload unless I lower sensitivity to next to minimum levels.

The results you see in this 6 minute video are exactly what I see when hunting wild targets here. The VX3 has the slight advantage in overall coil size. Notice that I have all of the iron filtering on minimum setting on the Garrett Vortex VX9.

Which detector's simultaneous multi frequency technology works best for identifying targets in these soil conditions?

There was lightening in the area and plenty of WiFi EMI interference. I tried to especially help the VX3 using frequency offsets. Nothing would help.

I have a new screen ordered for my VX3.

Thanks to Eureka Treasure Hunters Club, Denver Colorado for letting me borrow their Garrett Vortex VX9.

 
Last edited:
My only question is, why turn those on if lightning is in area?
I only had access to the Vortex for 24 hours. Testing it for Garrett.

Wouldn’t have mattered much lightening or not. All the VX3 and V3i detectors I’ve owned and used have not handled suburban EMI very well using multi 3 frequencies, especially WiFi and nearby electric lines
 
If you watched the video you will see that the Vortex part of the video was later in the day (darker). I wanted to do the video in one take but the lightening and a short shower forced me to go in for a while.
 
Still love my old MXT.
I really wish Garrett would bring back the V3i in a lighter and submersible model.
I don't want Garrett to bring back the V3i/VX3 unless it has way better audio response speed/recovery speed, way better simultaneous multi frequency operation and way better EMI mitigation. Keep the cool screen, the MXT single frequency relic mode operation, the really nice audio choices including mixed mode and put it in a Cadillac like build quality similar to the Garrett Axiom which is one of the most beautiful looking and feeling detectors I've ever used and it's a pulse induction that weighs between 3 and 4 lbs. depending on the coil used.
 
I don't want Garrett to bring back the V3i/VX3 unless it has way better audio response speed/recovery speed, way better simultaneous multi frequency operation and way better EMI mitigation. Keep the cool screen, the MXT single frequency relic mode operation, the really nice audio choices including mixed mode and put it in a Cadillac like build quality similar to the Garrett Axiom which is one of the most beautiful looking and feeling detectors I've ever used and it's a pulse induction that weighs between 3 and 4 lbs. depending on the coil used.
I agree completely.
Be a beast of a machine.
 
Top