Charles
Hello,
I received my Scuba Tector safely a few days ago. Unfortunately it will be a month or more before I can get out in the water with it and really test it out, as the water temps here won't be warm enough until then, which it will still be cold water even then lol. Anyway, I agree with your point of getting that charging cord plugged into the Scuba Tector is a chore and my hands aren't huge, people with larger hands will really find it difficult I'm afraid. As far as yours blinking even after charging all night, did you just plug it into a USB port of a computer? Per the manual it says that may take a long time to recharge, and suggest using a "quality" ac adaptor. I used the one off my iPhone and charged the unit up in about 35 min although it wasn't blinking showing it was low yet, I just wanted to ensure that the battery was fully charged, as I was getting ready to test it against my Vibra Tector 730. So I think if you use a wall charger plugged into the USB cord to charge the ST it will charge up much faster. Also just take along one of the portable rechargeable power packs that are widely available now, that way if you did happen to run the ST down you have a way to field charge it, but honestly if you charge it with a ac adaptor the night before your hunt I don't think you will have any issues. Here's my first impressions of the ST:
1: I like the angle of the search head in relation to the handle
2. I like the option of having it beep/vibrate/red led
3. I like the option of 4 levels of sensitivity
4. Plugging the charging cable into the ST is a pain in the rear
5. The included lanyard is nice, although the end to attach it to something to secure it is not large enough to go around your wrist. A great idea poorly executed.
6. Learning the various button pressing combinations will take time, it's easy to get confused and change settings that you didn't intend to
So I tested it on some various targets, a not so scientific test, I took a, 8 1/2" X 11" sheet of paper and put the ST at the end of it and waved various objects in front of the coil, marking on the paper where the signal was last detected. I drew a line down the center of the paper and tested the same objects with my Vibratector 730. The Scuba Tector was the clear winner, with the shortest detected distance on any object still better than the best detected distance with the VT 730. Impressive! I didn't measure any of the distances with a ruler, but it appeared the VT was good out to about 3" and the ST good to about 5-6" on most items just guesstimated. Now, we have to remember Pulse Induction units, which both of these units are, do not air test well at all. And from actually using the VT 730 I will say I have detected coins and rings much deeper than any of the items air tested on it. I've found silver, gold and junk rings with it and tons of coins. But if the ST is really as much "deeper" as it appears "on paper" then this will be an awesome special purpose detector. I was using the ST fully charged with it set to maximum sensitivity and the VT 730 had a fresh 9v battery. Again this was an air test, so we will see what "real world" testing shows. I think I will take them both to a place and use the VT 730 in a small area then take the ST behind it and see if it detects anything the VT missed and vice versa. But so far I really like the ST and I think it will pay for itself as the VT 730 has easily done. Just from what I know about it so far I would recommend it highly. I'll post more when I actually get to use it.