You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Looks like that new machine is working for you, but I have to ask just how deep were you digging these finds? Also, as someone else asked, was this a virgin or possibly a unhunted spot by other detectorists? Good luck on your next hunt there as I'm sure that you will be back. HH.
. Small question for you, are you getting clean easily recognizable tones on your machine or have you just figured out which scratchy signals or two way signals are likely to be deeper targets? My tones are not "clean" on mine, I have used smooth to clean them up a bit but targets that my SE hits and locks on to with repeating clean tones I am finding hard to duplicate with the ETrac. I usually run the ETrac with fast on as I am in pretty good trash. And generally about 20 ferrous and above disced out. Gain at 20-24, High trash and difficult ground. Auto +1-3, but my depth is severely lacking as I am not accurately ID'ing past the three or four inch mark. Yesterday, I dug a wheat at 3 inches that repeated at 1-32 in three directions, ended up being on edge, which I was expecting. I also am having a heck of a time on predicting depth or size of the target from the audio. Apparently you have figured most of this out and that's why I am asking you Any advice?
I have called ML and pretty much got the answer that at this point, we know as much as them.