I don't know about you guys, but a faster Explorer would be the cat's meow for me.
I have an ETrac and although it's faster than my SE's, I can't honestly say it's better or anywhere close to being it's replacement. They changed too much of the Explorer platform for my tastes. If they just made the Explorer with a faster recovery rate, without remapping the conductive scale, all of us would benefit hugely.
If the only changes made to the SE were a faster recovery speed and a new audio option like "inverse audio deep" : meaning that when that audio option was chosen (just like for example choosing audio long), with "inverse audio deep" chosen.... the deep targets would sound off loud and the shallow targets faint. I think we would all find a great deal more awesome finds in heavily, trashy sites because of the faster recovery rate as well as deeper finds in general because of the "inverse audio deep" option.
I would most definitely buy a "faster" Explorer (and yes, I know it wouldn't be a ETrac
), and I would live with "the weight" and "the glare" issues. Just give me a faster Explorer without mucking it up into something else.
Would anyone else like to see a more or less unchanged, other than, faster Explorer??? With just MINOR software changes, but basically a true Explorer platform. Help me out here in letting Mine Lab know that there is a definite market for such a machine by posting your replies and then I will send the whole thread to them in an email, and maybe they will make us a new Explorer.
I have an ETrac and although it's faster than my SE's, I can't honestly say it's better or anywhere close to being it's replacement. They changed too much of the Explorer platform for my tastes. If they just made the Explorer with a faster recovery rate, without remapping the conductive scale, all of us would benefit hugely.

If the only changes made to the SE were a faster recovery speed and a new audio option like "inverse audio deep" : meaning that when that audio option was chosen (just like for example choosing audio long), with "inverse audio deep" chosen.... the deep targets would sound off loud and the shallow targets faint. I think we would all find a great deal more awesome finds in heavily, trashy sites because of the faster recovery rate as well as deeper finds in general because of the "inverse audio deep" option.
I would most definitely buy a "faster" Explorer (and yes, I know it wouldn't be a ETrac


Would anyone else like to see a more or less unchanged, other than, faster Explorer??? With just MINOR software changes, but basically a true Explorer platform. Help me out here in letting Mine Lab know that there is a definite market for such a machine by posting your replies and then I will send the whole thread to them in an email, and maybe they will make us a new Explorer.
