Aarong81 said:
Here is a mod someone did with their MXT battery pack to get 9 AA rechargeable cells. Some users insist any voltage above the 'low battery' indicator provides the same voltage past the voltage regulator. I agree with the theory and I would side with that reasoning in VOLTAGE ALONE. I assume it has something to do with the total current(amps/wattage) rather than simple voltage which the voltage regulator only controls volts. Think about a car battery charger at 12 volts/10 amps vs 12 volts/50amps, the voltage is the same either way. That being the case, I would almost expect a different experience using 10 AAA cells even though it would meet the voltage requirements it may lack amperage.
I would trust better results from 9 rechargeable AA cells instead of 10 rechargeable AAA cells. As mentioned already, another downfall to 10 rechargeable AAA cells is that you could only achieve half the maH. That not only affects the lifespan but also the wattage/current(volts+amps=watts) available at a given time.
When AA rechargeables are running mid/low, do they provide the same amperage as AA Alkalines at the same mid/low range? Voltage is only HALF the equation and, in fact, you cannot calculate the watts/current without knowing BOTH volts and amps. AAA will lack the amps that AA will have. As "efficient" as the MXT is, it still requires a substantial signal(wattage) be sent/received through the coil.
SOURCE
I definitely agree that 9 AA cells is probably going to provide more run-time than 10 AAA cells for the simple reason of substantially greater mAH rating. This configuration also provides a voltage within spitting distance of 8 alkalines: 9 x 1.4 = 12.6 vs. 8 x 1.6 = 12.8 Even if we take a more conservative stand and only allow for the average operating voltage for NiMH (as stated in Wiki) of 1.25v per cell, we still get 11.25v - well above the reported threshold for wonky behavior. Plus we know that the rechargables decline in voltage differently than alkalines as they discharge and will likely remain at an acceptable voltage for a good long time before slipping below that magic 10v level. That having been said, I think Vito has shown that the AAA cells can provide adequate current to run the machine - big question remains - for how long?
I do think, however, that we are making a big assumption about a metal detector having a voltage regulator between the battery and the circuit board:
My main reason for saying this is that voltage regulators
waste power - and the bigger the voltage difference between the input and output side, the more power they waste! In electronics, power is defined by the formula P = V x I where "V" is the voltage across the device (the difference between the input and output sides) and "I" is the current passing through it. For the sake of example . . . if the input side was 10v and the output side was 5v, for any current being drawn, half the battery power is being wasted - it's dissipated as heat!
A second reason for not using one is the problem of "headroom". They require a minimum amount of voltage difference between the input and output sides in order to even function and pass any current. For example, the popular 78xx series 3-terminal regulators (the third terminal is ground reference) need 2 - 2.5v of headroom to function - that means your battery needs to supply that additional 2 - 2.5 volts just to get the regulator to work!
Third reason for not having a regulator - and this is more of a suspicion on my part, rather than a conviction - is that it may be completely unnecessary. Back in the old days of TTL (transistor/transistor logic), digital circuits had to operate at 5v - but we don't use that anymore. These days digital circuits use CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) which operates over a wide range of voltage. At this point, the shrewd reader will ask "what about the analog portions of the detector?" This calls for some speculation on my part because I have neither a schematic to consult nor a recently built machine to open up and look at but I would make an educated guess that a good portion of this circuit will be made up of op-amps (operational amplifiers). These have a multitude of uses beyond simply amplifying a signal, including active filtering, signal mixing and level comparing. Whole books have been written about the many applications for op-amps and guess what? - they operate over a wide range of supply voltage too.
If I was the engineer tasked with designing a metal detector (or any device that runs on batteries) I would strive to make it's operation as immune to supply voltage as I possibly could - it's just basic. In reality, the range of supply voltage that produces acceptable operation may still be only a couple or a few volts wide but that's probably preferable to using a voltage regulator given their drawbacks.
If anybody can produce a detector schematic that shows they actually do use a regulator, please post a link - I'd love to see what their circuit architecture looks like!
Sorry for the length of this . . . anybody still awake gets a standing ovation!
-pete