Hi Bud, I guess a lot of the threshold thinking comes from the early days of detecting when we had to run the old BFO and TR machines.
Back then we needed the threshold background to refer to because for example the BFO had to have a sort of motor boat tone basic background hum.
These older machines relied on this constant threshold for a reference point, the TR's were constantly effected by the distance between the coil and the ground, too close to the ground, and the threshold boomed, ( small targets were lost in the roaring threshold ) too high up off the ground and the detector nulled ( went silent ) this made the detector deaf, except for hearing really big objects.
Really deep/small targets can't create a loud sharp beep, but can make the threshold raise in pitch every time the coil is passed over the target; detecting with no threshold is kinda like someone putting cotton wool in their ears then not being able to hear a soft whisper! ___ I like to have a threshold personally.
The null I get when passing the coil over the ground tells me when I'm in a junky zone, this information would suggest to me that I ought to maybe come back to that area with a small coil to try and maybe pick out some keepers amongst the trash.
For me in this situation having my threshold null out has given me much information, a person detecting the same zone in silence ( no threshold ) won't know where this junk is.
Imagine sometime we might be looking for where an old colonial house once stood, we would then want to look for signs of a building once being there, like lots of rusted square head nails.
Detecting with maybe foil up accepted, with a background hum we will experience a lot of nulling when we reach a nail infested zone, so this is likely to be where a building was once...
Threshold for me ( mostly.)
