You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
argyle1 said:I've used both on very harsh ground Fletch, and still preferred the 8x6. Dunno, but I got the impression it slightly deeper with slightly better signal response. SEF 's are my favorite coils on a lot of machines, and that 8x6 I'm very fond of.
The 10x5 suffers what all skinny elliptical 's do, a thinning back of the blade toward the centre of the coil far too sharply, causing bad signal responses and cutting into depth. Where as the fat little 8x6 holds a nicer response .
sweeper60 said:argyle1 said:I've used both on very harsh ground Fletch, and still preferred the 8x6. Dunno, but I got the impression it slightly deeper with slightly better signal response. SEF 's are my favorite coils on a lot of machines, and that 8x6 I'm very fond of.
The 10x5 suffers what all skinny elliptical 's do, a thinning back of the blade toward the centre of the coil far too sharply, causing bad signal responses and cutting into depth. Where as the fat little 8x6 holds a nicer response .
If you use the Whites 6X10 it does not suffer from that, As the MXT was designed around the 6X10 But Whites decided to go with the 950 coil, The 5.3 coil will be deeper than the 8x6 coil, and the search patten is more uniform,
HH
5900_XL-1 said:sweeper60 said:argyle1 said:I've used both on very harsh ground Fletch, and still preferred the 8x6. Dunno, but I got the impression it slightly deeper with slightly better signal response. SEF 's are my favorite coils on a lot of machines, and that 8x6 I'm very fond of.
The 10x5 suffers what all skinny elliptical 's do, a thinning back of the blade toward the centre of the coil far too sharply, causing bad signal responses and cutting into depth. Where as the fat little 8x6 holds a nicer response .
If you use the Whites 6X10 it does not suffer from that, As the MXT was designed around the 6X10 But Whites decided to go with the 950 coil, The 5.3 coil will be deeper than the 8x6 coil, and the search patten is more uniform,
HH
Won't the 5.3" coil require lots more overlaps, resulting in longer search time? I've personally never found a better all around coil that the 8x6 for depth, ESPECIALLY when compared to the OEM 6x10 Eclipse.
Larry (IL) said:My experience with the two coils was just the opposite of what you are saying sweeper. In my mineralized ground the 8X6 was the better coil in both depth and target ID. I wasn't all that impressed with the 6X10. I have read in less mineralized ground like on the Florida beaches the 6X10 is very well liked though.
Larry (IL) said:I have used Nancy's MXT and I had an M6 and DFX using the said coils, but I currently use the V3i and an E-Trac. I use the 8X6 in trashy hunts with the V3i.