Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

What would you like to see in a first ORX update?

relicmeister

Well-known member
I have been an ORX user for almost 3 months now and
I’m overall very pleased with the performance. I have yet to
really use the gold modes in my relic hunting, and have used
mostly the mid to high frequencies and not so much the low.
I’ve never even tried the pinpoint function, and don’t see the need to.
For myself I would like to have a multi- tone option if that were
possible in an update, and possibly the ability to modify the
two tone break points.
I’d be interested in seeing what other Orx users want to
see in a first update.
 
I really like the ORX in every way except three things.

I have no problem with a 3 tone audio detector. I wish the tones were not so edgy and brash however. I would like a little more pitch to the 3 tones and less scratchiness on the edges of the tones.

I would like full tones added.

I would like more silencer adjustments for coin fast and some way to add silencer for coin deep. I still have a little trouble hearing iron grunt on crown bottle caps and some steel targets.

Jeff
 
MikeLab said:
Should have bought a Deus.


:drool:

I already have a Deus and it is not as good a gold prospector as the ORX. Seriously!!!

Jeff
 
Adjustable iron audio. That's all I would want extra.
 
Not having to readjust the settings every time I turn the machine on (Keep the last setting)
 
IRON VOLUME! It would really make the machine a lot better relic machine. It is good now but a iron volume control is a must these days.
 
Hi Calabash,

the Orx has Iron Volume on or off. Do you want it to have incremental adjustment? If so, I definitely will DITTO that.

Jeff
 
Good comments. It seems like users are for the most part satisfied
with the ORX as it is. There’s always something that would be
desirable. I’m not expecting to see any updates anytime soon.
If this go terrain app ever becomes available that would be great.
Not holding my breath thought
 
jmaclen said:
Hi Calabash,

the Orx has Iron Volume on or off. Do you want it to have incremental adjustment? If so, I definitely will DITTO that.

Jeff
Volume adjustment is what I was talking about. I need to hear the iron to locate relic sites and hearing it full blast gets tiring …….I need to be able to survey iron on relic sites so I need a volume control. Actually I would like them to update the Deus iron volume too ...I would like to be able to turn the volume down even more it is to loud at the lowest setting in iron loaded sites to me.
 
calabash digger said:
jmaclen said:
Hi Calabash,

the Orx has Iron Volume on or off. Do you want it to have incremental adjustment? If so, I definitely will DITTO that.

Jeff
Volume adjustment is what I was talking about. I need to hear the iron to locate relic sites and hearing it full blast gets tiring …….I need to be able to survey iron on relic sites so I need a volume control. Actually I would like them to update the Deus iron volume too ...I would like to be able to turn the volume down even more it is to loud at the lowest setting in iron loaded sites to me.



Iron volume control certainly is better than iron on or off.
Maybe just iron off, iron low, iron hi would be good enough?
as opposed to 10 volume levels.
In any case is that a reasonable thing to change in an update?
 
relicmeister said:
Iron volume control certainly is better than iron on or off.
Maybe just iron off, iron low, iron hi would be good enough?
as opposed to 10 volume levels.
I had an XP ORX and might get another with the 5X9½ HF coil because if filled a niche in my Outfit. It had a simple On or Off for the Low-Tone. That would typically be desired as an Iron Range Audio Tone, but since the Tone Break is incorporated with the Discrimination setting, the Iron Audio is simply a Low Tone Audio and could cover a good size portion of the Non-Ferrous range for those who prefer a lot of rejection. I don't but some do.

For those not interested in ferrous trash at all, the ON or OFF adjustment is sort of useful on the ORX because it doesn't provide a typical Discrimination design that incorporates audio target rejection with the setting. If it did, the On or OFF wouldn't be needed.

We should have a simple OFF - LOW - HIGH setting for Iron Volume soon in the Simplex+, I believe, and even that can be better than a full-volume setting. I do hunt in a processed-audio 3-Tone mode most of the time with my Nokta FORS CoRe and Fisher T2+ with the Disc. set low enough to accept most common iron nails because I like to listen FOR the iron trash in an area to help locate past activity. Both models have a full volume level for all detected targets. Most of the time in a dense iron nail site, with nails more plentiful than other types of ferrous and non-ferrous trash, I favor hunting in a VCO enhanced 2-Tone mode because it will quite often let desirable non-ferrous targets 'pop-out' better to be unmasked when in close proximity to a ferrous debris.

Those models and their performance work well, but I favor them for sparse iron contaminated sites. When there is a lot of iron to deal with, I use a lower Disc. level because I still like to listen FOR iron junk, I just don't like to listen TO the abundant Iron Audio responses. For that I then prefer to grab my Nokta FORS Relic or Makro Racer 2 which DO have a selectable Iron Audio Volume control [size=small](0 for OFF or 1 to 5 levels for very low to full volume)[/size] or for more urban applications my Fisher F-44 where I assign one of four Audio Tones to a segment and control the Ferrous range Volume Level with the 1-to-20 setting Volume Control [size=small](I use a Volume level of '12')[/size]. With these models, the Relic, Racer 2 and F-44, I can keep the Iron Volume level at a hearable but pleasant Low Volume level to better enjoy the search.


relicmeister said:
In any case is that a reasonable thing to change in an update?
NO, not in my opinion. The ORX or Deus or any other detector is what it is. I am not a big fan of "updates' even though we're in this modern digital era. They need to do the R&D and then build a quality product, test it out, fix what needs fixing, and get it right before the let it out the door to consumers. Maybe make one subtle but needed change in production as a revision, but I don't like the idea of plugging a detector in to tweak all sorts of stuff to try and please a few people. That's what they do for the few forum beggars because more detectors are out there being used and working fine for a lot more consumers.

In that case, the Deus is what it is. It's a good detector, but I don't like it for me and my needs. I do, however, like the ORX that basically has Deus power and general performance without a lot of extra adjustable fluff. For me, the ORX is a very good detector form many site challenges I face. If I feel there too much iron at a site, I simply grab a different detector from my Outfit that better handles the trash challenges. I never have the attitude that only one detector is needed to do everything I want to do afield, and I've encouraged people to do what I do and own at least two detectors to complement each other. Been doing that since '71/'72 and it sure works for me hunting many different types of sites.

Instead of fooling around with doing an 'update' to an already good detector, just consider Iron Volume as something for the R&D folks to work on as they develop a future model. Do it now to have everything checked out and tested so a new model will have what consumers want and work as needed. They can do that while also working on a smaller-size search coils for the Deus and ORX which is more desired, I believe, than Iron Audio Volume. Most folks reject Iron and don't want to hear it and I.A.V. is really for the more dedicated and savvy Avid Detectorist and not of great interest to the Average Hobbyist.

Monte
 
That last part of your post is way off base IMO Monte.... this is the modern age where we dont have to spend another 1000 bucks on another detector for a few minor tweaks done for a new release..... Deus has done some great things with there updates in the last few years.....

WHY IN the world would anybody want to buy another detector for a few new tweaks when it can be done in a update?

So from your logic we should just wait for Deus to make a new mid range model and give them another 700 bucks for a detector with a iron volume instead of asking them to update it for free.....IMO your opinion of updates is way off base but I see from your post you have never really used updatable units before. I have updated my Deus with all the new updates over the last few years and it only has gotten to be a better unit...
 
calabash digger said:
That last part of your post is way off base IMO Monte.... this is the modern age where we dont have to spend another 1000 bucks on another detector for a few minor tweaks done for a new release..... Deus has done some great things with there updates in the last few years.....

WHY IN the world would anybody want to buy another detector for a few new tweaks when it can be done in a update?

So from your logic we should just wait for Deus to make a new mid range model and give them another 700 bucks for a detector with a iron volume instead of asking them to update it for free.....IMO your opinion of updates is way off base but I see from your post you have never really used updatable units before. I have updated my Deus with all the new updates over the last few years and it only has gotten to be a better unit...

[size=large]+1[/size]
 
We've always had the ability to 'fix' something or 'add' something by a manufacturer doing some R&D and making an in-house 'Revision' to a model. However not all things are easily or practically 'fixable.' I noted a glitch in the Fisher F-44 design earlier this year and called it to the attention of some tech guys at FTP. They didn't know about it, and it seemed to me like it might be 'fixable' if I sent my unit in, but I was told it wasn't fixable, so I live with it.

That's happened with other detectors I've evaluated over the past decade or two of more 'modern' detectors. Then there have been things that a manufacturer 'fixed' either with the unit or in a revision for future production, but in doing so there was a trade-off that affected something else. I've experienced the same with some of the 'updateable' models and usually the 'fix' or 'change' or 'repair' worked fine ... but sometimes there was an unanticipated trade-off that effected a different feature or function and you could tell the difference in performance.

Some of the wished-for features can't simply be 'updated' via the internet because the device doesn't have the capability to adapt to a new function, or the hardware or software to make it work. Perhaps there isn't a slot on the display or way to provide a visual adjustment control or show a new feature.

A manufacturer might do something different that doesn't appeal to everyone but it just can't be 'fixed.' Instead a revision, or new model, has to be made to incorporate the changes desired. For example, I personally prefer XP's ORX to their Deus. I like almost everything about it, but it isn't designed the same as many 'normal' detectors are designed. For example, My Nokta FORS CoRe has a Discriminate level control, and if I set it at '10' I am then low enough to accept most Iron Nails, which I like to hear, but they are at full volume. Also, I get a Low-Tone audio on them because they are below the Ferrous / Non-Ferrous break-point of '40.' A Disc. setting of '21' rejects most iron nails and, at that setting all targets with a VDI of '21 or less are rejected or not heard. But more conductive targets, to include some iron, that falls above '21' and up to '40' still sounds off with the Low-Tone Iron Audio response.

In 2016 I also added the Nokta Relic and Makro Racer 2 to my outfit. The FORS Relic has a Ferrous break-point of '20' and a Disc. setting of '05' Accepts most Iron Nails. If I incre3ase it to '10' the nails are silent or rejected. The Racer 2 has a Ferrous / Non-Ferrous break-point of '10' and a Disc. setting of '03' is low enough for me to hear iron nails, and a setting of '05' will have most iron nails just barely rejected and I won't hear them.

With the CoRe, there is no "Tone Break' to adjust and all targets with a VDI response below '40' will produce a low-tone Iron Audio response, and targets above '40' will either be a VCO enhanced high-tone in the 2-Tone mode, or the middle-or-higher processed audio in 3-Tone mode. With the Relic and Racer 2 I leave my lower Tone Break setting at the Ferrous / Non-ferrous break point. On these two models I have a manual Tone Break Adjustment and I also have a variable Discrimination adjustment. The Disc. mode, as most traditional detector designs provide, allows me to increase it to Discriminate or reject, or cancel or silence any unwanted trash targets below that setting, and in this case I'll refer to common Iron Nails. Thus, all targets that have a conductivity less than the Discriminate setting are silent. I can Discriminate or reject common iron nails when too plentiful and not hear them or other less-conductive targets. That means that ay iron object that is more-conductive than the iron nail will provide the lower Iron Audio Tone.

You can't do that with the ORX.

Their design incorporated a Tone Break adjustment in the Discrimination control setting. If I increase the Discrimination to a setting of '07' on the ORX, I have also set the Tone Break for Low-Tone and Mid-Tone at '07.' All targets that have a VDI of '07' or less produce a Low-Tone or what is wrongly called Iron Audio, but that means that more conductive ferrous trash that might register a higher VDI, such as '09' to '21' will then produce a Mid-Tone which we generally associate with being a mid-conductor and not lower.

So if they can do updates without circuitry and design changes like you suggest, then I want an ORX Update:

I want a separate Discrimination Adjustment for 'normal' target rejection, and I want a separate Tone Break Adjustment to adjust the Tone Break point where I want it separate from a rejection setting of the Discrimination circuitry. Not doable.

So 'MY LOGIC' is that yes, some things can be tweaked a little if you can maybe fix-a-glitch with an 'update,' but you can't always have it your way when it just isn't doable. Besides, there's no such thing as a 'perfect' detector and it doesn't hurt to invest in two or more models that a user feels will best handle the situations they plan to confront.

Don't like seeing everything in black-and-white? Have an 'update' to add color to your display.

Vision not like it used to be or a display that is a bit too small and difficult to see? Ask for an 'update' to have your Deus audibly tell you about the display read-out and depth and what you've maybe found with a synthesized voice.

Can you adjust the Pinpoint Sensitivity level separate from just the All Metal or Disc. mode Sensitivity? If not, just get that 'update' fix now to be ready for your next outing.

Don't look now, but there are a lot of things people would like to have changed or fixed, but many of them just are not doable, at least not with a remote 'update'.. It would take a physical design or revision, or just work the desired features into a future new model release. And it doesn't have to be more expensive, either.

Monte
 
Top