Sure there's a lot of hype and marketing. What would you expect from a manufacturer that wants to sell a new detector?
But at a $600 price point I think odds are good that the AT Pro is going to be a winner. It sounds like Garrett has "borrowed" a lot of positive advancements that others (most noticably First Texas) have made. And that's a good thing. If this Garrett gets excellent depth, has Garrett's traditional durability and has a retune speed close to some other manufacturers as opposed to their current slowwww lineup that's a major plus that could have me considering Garrett again.
The waterproof feature is a BIG one, even for inland hunters like me. There are times I hunt in light rain and drizzle and I use rain covers but they are a pain in the rear.
Last but not least, Bill Revis has a lot of credibility. If he says it's going to be good I believe him.
But at a $600 price point I think odds are good that the AT Pro is going to be a winner. It sounds like Garrett has "borrowed" a lot of positive advancements that others (most noticably First Texas) have made. And that's a good thing. If this Garrett gets excellent depth, has Garrett's traditional durability and has a retune speed close to some other manufacturers as opposed to their current slowwww lineup that's a major plus that could have me considering Garrett again.
The waterproof feature is a BIG one, even for inland hunters like me. There are times I hunt in light rain and drizzle and I use rain covers but they are a pain in the rear.
Last but not least, Bill Revis has a lot of credibility. If he says it's going to be good I believe him.