Much Appreciated Al. How have you been? It's been a long time since we swapped eMails. Where do the years slip away to? <img src="/metal/html/confused.gif" border=0 width=15 height=22 alt=":?">
I've had numerous eMails from readers and posters about the different tests on the Tejon, and I've pretty much responded to them all in the same way, suggesting that those considering this particular machine should print out copies of mine, Scully's, and now Monte's test reports, read and consider them all, and in the process, you should get one of the most informative and "balanced" group of opinions or "field testing" of any machine ever placed on the market. All three reports contain likes and dislikes about the machine, specifics about what it is capable of, sometimes in comparison to other machines, and very specific "nit-picking" based on alot of years of experience between the writers. I don't think we will EVER see anything to compare this collective information in any of the monthly detecting magazines, or anywhere else for that matter. Not tooting my own horn here, but this is the kind of information that "should" be made available on every new machine that hits the market. Thanks to forums such as these at Findmall, we have an honest and open route to post and discuss this kind of thing without having our words arbitrarily "edited" or outright deleted just because someone else doesn't agree with what is said.
Thanks again for the kind words......
Ralph